Hi Alan,
On 2010-05-06 02:12, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
The multiple platform test moral is still correct, however; there are
certain segfaults that show up on some platforms and not others.
I propagated the changes to examples 6 and 7 to F77, F95 and Tcl (the
latter not tested yet, but the
On 2010-05-06 08:58+0200 Arjen Markus wrote:
[...]in the process of testing I came across a rather strange
problem:
(I ran on Windows XP, with the MinGW GNU compilers)
test-drv-info stops with an error of -10356462 (or something similar),
thus terminating the build. Restarting the build
Hi Alan,
this is indeed very puzzling! I have never seen it before - and all
the stuff I used I have used countless times before.
I will try and reproduce it.
As for the PostScript files: they look fine to me - there is nothing
wrong with them.
Also puzzling: why does a repeated invocation of
Hi Alan,
On 2010-05-06 16:27, Arjen Markus wrote:
Hi Alan,
this is indeed very puzzling! I have never seen it before - and all
the stuff I used I have used countless times before.
I will try and reproduce it.
It has disappeared! The only thing I can think of that is different
is the
On May 6, 2010, at 7:27 , Arjen Markus wrote:
this is indeed very puzzling! I have never seen it before - and all
the stuff I used I have used countless times before.
Also puzzling: why does a repeated invocation of test-drv-info via
make
examine different drivers? It must be recording
On 2010-05-06 16:37, David MacMahon wrote:
On May 6, 2010, at 7:27 , Arjen Markus wrote:
this is indeed very puzzling! I have never seen it before - and all
the stuff I used I have used countless times before.
Also puzzling: why does a repeated invocation of test-drv-info via make
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:45:50AM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca
wrote:
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
Alan,
Thank you for looking in to this. ??My reason for making that change
was that it
On 2010-05-05 23:42+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:45:50AM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca
wrote:
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
Alan,
Thank you for looking in to this. ??My
On 2010-05-05 16:29-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
It is interesting that I didn't see that x01cc segfault in my early tests
that originally showed the Tcl and Python issues. Or in my tests after I
fixed the Tcl and Python issues. I therefore think this is one of those
cases where x01cc
Hi Alan, Hez,
I will have a look at the interface for Tcl - the coordinate
transformation is a bit roundabout there, as I need a C function
to call the actual Tcl procedure for the transformation. Possibly
this is causing the empty page. My guess is the same holds for
the Python bindings.
Hi Alan, Hez,
I had to plough through a myriad of mails, so my response was a
bit premature/late. Okay, I see it has been solved. My task will
then be to propagate the recent changes to the Fortran 77/95 and
Tcl examples, if not done yet.
Regards,
Arjen
On 2010-05-03 08:58, Arjen Markus wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
Alan,
Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
that both arguments
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
Alan,
Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
that both arguments are non-NULL - if the pltr function does not
require any extra data to be
On 2010-04-29 14:46-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2010-04-29 14:22-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
python
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 06 07 15 19 21
Missing stdout :
Differing stdout:
tcl
Missing examples:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Alan W. Irwin
ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
On 2010-04-29 14:46-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2010-04-29 14:22-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
python
Missing examples :
Differing postscript output : 06 07 15 19 21
Missing stdout :
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
Alan,
Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
that both arguments are non-NULL - if the pltr function does not
require any extra data to be
Alan W. Irwin writes:
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
Alan,
Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
that both arguments are non-NULL - if the pltr function does
On 2010-05-01 21:26-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
Alan W. Irwin writes:
On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
Alan,
Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change
was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require
that both
Alan W. Irwin writes:
On 2010-05-01 21:26-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
What is the simplest statement of the commumdrum?
If you apply the following patch
[...]
in accordance with Hez's arguments above, then plshade and plshades quit
working (blank results or one giant triangle
Here is the current status of our standard examples (from make
test_noninteractive) for all our languages.
c++
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 06 07 19
Missing stdout :
Differing stdout:
f77
Missing examples:
On 2010-04-29 14:22-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
python
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 06 07 15 19 21
Missing stdout :
Differing stdout:
tcl
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output : 06 07 15 16 19 21 28
21 matches
Mail list logo
