On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:28:20PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2009-01-07 06:23+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
So, I reckon the Tcl examples now all give a perfect match
(at least with Tcl 8.5), only example 19 is still missing.
Hi Arjen:
I confirm the perfect (except for missing ex 19)
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:28:20PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2009-01-07 06:23+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
So, I reckon the Tcl examples now all give a perfect match
(at least with Tcl 8.5), only example 19 is still missing.
Hi Arjen:
I confirm the perfect (except for missing ex 19)
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 at 06:23:06 (+0100) Arjen Markus writes:
On 2009-01-05 10:33+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
Now, there are still the strange deviations in example 11. I am not
sure how to proceed here - probably the same stubbornness as for
example 20 is required :).
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:32:17AM +, Andrew Ross wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:28:20PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2009-01-07 06:23+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
So, I reckon the Tcl examples now all give a perfect match
(at least with Tcl 8.5), only example 19 is still missing.
On 2009-01-05 10:33+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
Example 20 is causing me a slight headache :(. I have checked just
about everything I could think of:
- All expressions are braced
- The file is read correctly - all values are identical to the
values I see in the C example
- The PostScript
On 2009-01-05 10:33+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
Now, there are still the strange deviations in example 11. I am not
sure how to proceed here - probably the same stubbornness as for
example 20 is required :).
It turned out to be easier than that: the cause was the same as
before but in a
On 2009-01-07 06:23+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
So, I reckon the Tcl examples now all give a perfect match
(at least with Tcl 8.5), only example 19 is still missing.
Hi Arjen:
I confirm the perfect (except for missing ex 19) results for Tcl-8.5 on
Linux as well. Good work!
Alan
