Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-27 Thread Hezekiah M. Carty
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2011-10-27 07:51-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Alan W. Irwin >> wrote: >>> >>> To the PLplot developers here: I think we should implement standard >>> example x00 in C similar to the way Steve describ

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-27 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2011-10-27 07:51-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Alan W. Irwin > wrote: >> >> To the PLplot developers here: I think we should implement standard >> example x00 in C similar to the way Steve described with the emphasis >> on keeping it an extraordinarily simple

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-27 Thread Hezekiah M. Carty
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > To the PLplot developers here: I think we should implement standard > example x00 in C similar to the way Steve described with the emphasis > on keeping it an extraordinarily simple plot as described in > http://plplot.sourceforge.net/docbo

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-26 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2011-10-26 11:03-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2011-10-26 11:53+0100 Steve Schwartz wrote: > >> While I'm writing, if someone does try to put together a tutorial >> system/prescription, and even if they don't, a very simple real working >> example would be a good addition. The various examples

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-26 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2011-10-26 11:53+0100 Steve Schwartz wrote: > While I'm writing, if someone does try to put together a tutorial > system/prescription, and even if they don't, a very simple real working > example would be a good addition. The various examples shiped with > plplot are a really excellent and fair

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-26 Thread Steve Schwartz
Alan, Apologies, this was originally sent from my home personal email account by mistake, hence the bounce. Here it is again. (with a top-post addendum) While I'm writing, if someone does try to put together a tutorial system/prescription, and even if they don't, a very simple real working exampl

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-25 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2011-10-25 18:11+0100 Steve Schwartz wrote: > It's a little confusing since the plplot_install directory has the main > dll's in bin, and the drivers somewhere else. I think the problem is > somewhere in the compile, because if I open a clean MSDOS commant prompt > window, execute my batch scri

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-25 Thread Steve Schwartz
Dear All On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 14:49 +0200, Arjen Markus wrote: > good to hear that - if you find out what caused the trouble in the > first place, let us know. Don't know, but I think some combination of white spaces in path names (although CMake install itself in a folder "CMake 2.8" and works

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-25 Thread Arjen Markus
Hi Steve, good to hear that - if you find out what caused the trouble in the first place, let us know. Regards, Arjen On 2011-10-25 14:00, Steve Schwartz wrote: > Alan/Arjen, > > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 17:04 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: >> Good luck, and let us know how it goes. > > Thanks. I'v

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-25 Thread Steve Schwartz
Alan/Arjen, On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 17:04 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > Good luck, and let us know how it goes. Thanks. I've succeeded. I * reinstalled cmake in C:\programs [a folder with no white-spaces] * put plplot likewise in C:\programs * followed Alan's advice for the order of arguments to

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-25 Thread Arjen Markus
Hello Steve, I checked what option value is expected for /machine on my system and the file "build.make" generated by CMake contain a setting like: /machine:X86 Can you check in any of these files on your system what value they contain? I do not know where CMake is getting the values from but the

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-24 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2011-10-24 19:13+0100 Steve Schwartz wrote: > C:\Program Files\plplot\plplot_build>cmake "C:\Program Files\plplot > \plplot-5.9.9" -G "NMake Makefiles" -DBUILD_TEST=ON > -DENABLE_f77:BOOL=OFF -DENABLE_java:BOOL=OFF -DENABLE_python:BOOL=OFF > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PATH="C:\Program Files\plplot\plplot_

Re: [Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-24 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2011-10-24 19:13+0100 Steve Schwartz wrote: > For those who recognise this, here's my problem: > > LINK : fatal error LNK1146: no argument specified with option > '/machine:' > > - > > Sorry for a slightly random posting, but I've recommended plplot to a > couple of students doing a

[Plplot-devel] Visual Studio C++ Build - LINK fatal error

2011-10-24 Thread Steve Schwartz
For those who recognise this, here's my problem: LINK : fatal error LNK1146: no argument specified with option '/machine:' - Sorry for a slightly random posting, but I've recommended plplot to a couple of students doing a project under me, and they've hit a snag trying to install plp