On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Alan W. Irwin
wrote:
> On 2011-01-24 17:11-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> [...]The current status is I have just finished all C changes (except for
>> implementation of the PL_POSITION_SUBPAGE bit logic) related to
>> pllegend. The C results look fine. However, i
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Alan W. Irwin
wrote:
> On 2011-01-25 16:37-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> On 2011-01-24 17:11-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>
>>> [...]The current status is I have just finished all C changes (except for
>>> implementation of the PL_POSITION_SUBPAGE bit logic) relate
On 2011-01-25 16:37-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2011-01-24 17:11-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> [...]The current status is I have just finished all C changes (except for
>> implementation of the PL_POSITION_SUBPAGE bit logic) related to
>> pllegend. The C results look fine. However, in order
On 2011-01-24 17:11-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> [...]The current status is I have just finished all C changes (except for
> implementation of the PL_POSITION_SUBPAGE bit logic) related to
> pllegend. The C results look fine. However, in order to avoid core C
> commits which break language compon
I have been inactive recently with PLplot because of computer troubles
(failing disk ==> computer replacement ==> install Debian testing),
but all is well now so I will have some time to work on PLplot without
distraction for the next little while.
So on to business. I was hoping not to do this ag
