Re: [Plplot-devel] Latest comparison results show there is some work to do

2009-08-13 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-08-12 21:16+0200 Werner Smekal wrote: > i'm going to do the lua [...]changes. Hi Werner: Just for your information, the plslabelfunc API that has recently been implemented in bindings/swig-support/plplotcapi.i for Python and Java was not working correctly for Lua, and there was a resulti

Re: [Plplot-devel] Latest comparison results show there is some work to do

2009-08-12 Thread Andrew Ross
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:16:41PM +0200, Werner Smekal wrote: > Hi, > > >> > >> The principal issues are recent important changes to our API and C > >> examples > >> 3, 16, and 19 have not been propagated much (if at all) to our other > >> languages yet. Please do what you can for languages of

Re: [Plplot-devel] Latest comparison results show there is some work to do

2009-08-12 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi, >> >> The principal issues are recent important changes to our API and C >> examples >> 3, 16, and 19 have not been propagated much (if at all) to our other >> languages yet. Please do what you can for languages of interest to >> you to >> help clean this up for our forthcoming release.

Re: [Plplot-devel] Latest comparison results show there is some work to do

2009-08-10 Thread Hazen Babcock
Alan W. Irwin wrote: > The latest comparisons between results for various languages and our C > results are not as clean as they have been in the recent past. Here is the > summary (as given by both ctest in the build tree and "make > test_noninteractive" in the installed examples tree). > > c++