On Sep 7, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Hi Jerry:
>
> On 2010-09-07 19:49-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
>>
>> User programs that previously relied on the built-in declarations of
>> Vector and Matrix _might_ now have a problem.
>
> From my tests, I don't think the standard Ada (both thin and thi
Hi Jerry:
On 2010-09-07 19:49-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
> User programs that previously relied on the built-in declarations of
> Vector and Matrix _might_ now have a problem.
>From my tests, I don't think the standard Ada (both thin and thick)
examples are affected by this. Do those examples do somet
On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:09 AM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> On 2010-07-13 09:47-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/13/2010 01:21 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
I think very little effort would be required to remove
HAVE_ADA_2007
from the
On 2010-07-23 17:44-0700 Jerry wrote:
> I do normal PLplot builds fairly often and always before I commit
> changes. I just now did a sucessful build so everything looks good
here [with Ada].
Excellent!
Alan
__
Alan W. Irwin
Astronomical research affiliation with Departm
On Jul 22, 2010, at 11:16 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-07-22 14:29-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>
>>> I will now strip out all this configuration machinery so that the
>>> template files are treated directly as source files with no need to
>>
On 2010-07-22 14:29-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> I will now strip out all this configuration machinery so that the
>> template files are treated directly as source files with no need to
>> copy them. A beneficial side benefit of that change is I wi
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-07-22 04:09-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
>> On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> After that commit I can take over and do the necessary further
>>> changes
>>> to make those files non-configurable (from the CMake point of vie
On 2010-07-22 04:09-0700 Jerry wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> After that commit I can take over and do the necessary further changes
>> to make those files non-configurable (from the CMake point of view),
>> rename them without the *.cmake index in such a way that w
On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-07-13 09:47-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> On 07/13/2010 01:21 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> I think very little effort would be required to remove HAVE_ADA_2007
>>> from the build system. However, let's wait to do anything about
>>
On Jul 12, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-07-12 10:56-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> On 07/08/2010 06:43 PM, Jerry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
gcc 4.5 just landed in Fedora rawhide. Now getting the following
error
buil
On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-07-13 09:47-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> On 07/13/2010 01:21 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> I think very little effort would be required to remove HAVE_ADA_2007
>>> from the build system. However, let's wait to do anything about
>>
On Jul 13, 2010, at 12:21 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-07-12 19:44-0700 Jerry wrote:
>
>> I'm beginning to have second thoughts about whether this
>> HAVE_ADA_2007
>> business is worth the trouble. If the flag is not set, the Ada
>> bindings still work fine if the compiler is Ada 95 or Ad
On 2010-07-13 09:47-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 01:21 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>
>> I think very little effort would be required to remove HAVE_ADA_2007
>> from the build system. However, let's wait to do anything about this
>> until we understand the linking issue that Orion re
On 07/13/2010 01:21 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> I think very little effort would be required to remove HAVE_ADA_2007
> from the build system. However, let's wait to do anything about this
> until we understand the linking issue that Orion reported a lot more.
> I still think the linking issue may
On 2010-07-12 19:44-0700 Jerry wrote:
> I'm beginning to have second thoughts about whether this HAVE_ADA_2007
> business is worth the trouble. If the flag is not set, the Ada
> bindings still work fine if the compiler is Ada 95 or Ada 2005. None
> of the lapack and blas stuff is actually used--on
On Jul 12, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-07-12 10:56-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> On 07/08/2010 06:43 PM, Jerry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
gcc 4.5 just landed in Fedora rawhide. Now getting the following
error
buil
On 2010-07-12 10:56-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 06:43 PM, Jerry wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>>> gcc 4.5 just landed in Fedora rawhide. Now getting the following
>>> error
>>> building Ada examples. Looks like we may need to add -llapack to
>
On 07/08/2010 06:43 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> gcc 4.5 just landed in Fedora rawhide. Now getting the following
>> error
>> building Ada examples. Looks like we may need to add -llapack to
>> the link,
>> but not sure where this should be done.
>
On Jul 8, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> gcc 4.5 just landed in Fedora rawhide. Now getting the following
>> error
>> building Ada examples. Looks like we may need to add -llapack to
>> the link,
>> but not sure where this should be do
On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> gcc 4.5 just landed in Fedora rawhide. Now getting the following
> error
> building Ada examples. Looks like we may need to add -llapack to
> the link,
> but not sure where this should be done.
GNAT (GNU Ada Translator) 2005 and 2012 req
20 matches
Mail list logo
