Re: [Plplot-devel] Problem with dynamic drivers under MinGW

2008-10-21 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-10-21 06:28+0200 Arjen Markus wrote: Hello, I am experiencing a few problems with the new dynamic drivers under MinGW (MSYS+MinGW to be more precise). [...] [ 19%] Built target get-drv-info [ 19%] Built target ps [ 20%] Built target ps_CHECK Scanning dependencies of target wingcc

Re: [Plplot-devel] Problem with dynamic drivers under MinGW

2008-10-21 Thread Arjen Markus
Werner Smekal wrote: yes, this is a problem, I wrote that the dll directory needs to be in path. Don't copy the dlls, since if you change something and you forget to copy again, you won't see the effect :). So add the dll directories to the path, but if you want to test examples you need to

Re: [Plplot-devel] Problem with dynamic drivers under MinGW

2008-10-21 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi Arjen, I am not sure CMake recognises that it is working under MSYS - I saw that the MSYS flag is off in the output I posted. So, it may be using the MinGW logic. I'm quite sure, that it cmake recognizes MSYS. It tests for sh.exe (or bash.exe) and then it knows that it's working in

Re: [Plplot-devel] Problem with dynamic drivers under MinGW

2008-10-21 Thread Arjen Markus
Werner Smekal wrote: Hi Arjen, I am not sure CMake recognises that it is working under MSYS - I saw that the MSYS flag is off in the output I posted. So, it may be using the MinGW logic. I'm quite sure, that it cmake recognizes MSYS. It tests for sh.exe (or bash.exe) and then

Re: [Plplot-devel] Status of the website style

2008-10-21 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi Alan, My recent commit messages (up to revision 8947) pretty much describe what I was doing for my liquid-layout style. I have used the liquid layout style as the default with the single static style used before accessible as an alternative. To switch between the two styles use the View

Re: [Plplot-devel] Status of the website style

2008-10-21 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-10-21 18:00-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: N.B. look for further e-mail tomorrow (Wednesday) when your read this in case I have found the source of this (vertical fuzzy) line (which doesn't scale) by then. Hi Werner: I found the source of the problem (an unnecessary image used to make a