On 2013-12-19 07:55- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> see my remarks below.
>
> Regards,
>
> Arjen
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>>
>> @Arjen:
>>
>> Limited tests?? for a complete system build environment were run for 64-bit??
>> Cy
Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>
> Thanks for your replies on the degree of testing and what components of
> PLplot you
> tested on your different Windows platforms. That's going to be a big help to
> users.
>
> > The hardware of t
I plan to try the comprehensive test script for my Debian based configurations
later. In the meantime I've been trying to build plplot on a CentOS 5.10
machine at work. This is old software now and I expected problems. I also
have no root access so have to work with what's there.
I build only c
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:10:25PM +, Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> Tried to run build_plplot which fails straight away with
>
> 1%] Performing download step (verify and extract) for 'build_qt4_lite'
> cd /tmp/build_plplot/build_dir-linux/epa_build/Source &&
> /nfs/see-archive-15_a58/l
> ecanr/so
Hi Andrew:
Thanks for this very interesting test. More below.
On 2013-12-19 13:10- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> I plan to try the comprehensive test script for my Debian based configurations
> later. In the meantime I've been trying to build plplot on a CentOS 5.10
> machine at work. This is old
On 2013-12-19 13:44- Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:10:25PM +, Andrew Ross wrote:
>>
>> Tried to run build_plplot which fails straight away with
>>
>> 1%] Performing download step (verify and extract) for 'build_qt4_lite'
>> cd /tmp/build_plplot/build_dir-linux/epa_build
On 2013-12-19 10:55- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>> [...]There is some additional information I need as well if it is
>> straightforward for you to
>> figure it out.
>>
>> * Version of the underlying
On Dec 19, 2013, at 6:10 AM, Andrew Ross
wrote:
>
> I plan to try the comprehensive test script for my Debian based
> configurations
> later. In the meantime I've been trying to build plplot on a CentOS 5.10
> machine at work. This is old software now and I expected problems. I also
> have
More responses below.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:25:19AM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> Hi Andrew:
>
> Thanks for this very interesting test. More below.
>
> On 2013-12-19 13:10- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >
> > I plan to try the comprehensive test script for my Debian based
> > configurations
>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:19:59AM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2013-12-19 13:44- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:10:25PM +, Andrew Ross wrote:
> >>
> >>Tried to run build_plplot which fails straight away with
> >>
> >> 1%] Performing download step (verify and extract)
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:35:52PM +, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:06:53AM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> > To Andrew, Jerry, Arjen, and Phil:
> >
> > There are some important questions below for you. I need those
> > questions answered for the release notes (README.release) for
On 2013-12-19 22:26- Andrew Ross wrote:
> Cmake chose to build a static library, not me, so I assume something was
> missing for building shared versions.
I assume you are discussing just the PLplot part of the epa_build. Just
like for ordinary PLplot builds the default should be shared
libr
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:48:31PM -0700, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2013, at 6:10 AM, Andrew Ross
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I plan to try the comprehensive test script for my Debian based
> > configurations
> > later. In the meantime I've been trying to build plplot on a CentOS 5.10
> > machine
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:29:00PM +, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:19:59AM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> > I believe I have now fixed that issue with revision 12888.
> >
> > And since you are currently failing on yelp-xsl, that implies that
> > build_plplot_lite (which does not
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:52:55PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2013-12-19 22:26- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> > Cmake chose to build a static library, not me, so I assume something was
> > missing for building shared versions.
>
> I assume you are discussing just the PLplot part of the epa_build.
On 2013-12-19 22:50- Andrew Ross wrote:
> I've now also run the scripts/comprehensive_test.sh test on my Ubuntu
> system. I encountered some problems in that on several occasions,
> without warning, by kde session died. It was not reproducible, but in
> each case it was while running the test_
On 2013-12-19 23:41- Andrew Ross wrote:
> In the install tree
>
> readelf -d libitcl3.4.so
> shows rpath is not set. On the other hand
> readelf -d libtcl8.6.so
> correctly sets rpath.
I confirm the above for the epa_build results here. And post-release
I suppose I should modify the autotool
On 2013-12-19 16:11-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2013-12-19 22:50- Andrew Ross wrote:
>> Eventually I managed to get through almost all the tests though. The
>> only issue I encountered was a segfault with the C++ qt_example for the
>> nondyndriver case. Valgrind shows an invalid call to fre
I applaud everyone's recent efforts here to make this the best-tested
release of PLplot ever. One side effect, however, is I have been
responding (with my own short tests to confirm results or not) to
e-mail all day from you guys. And there is still a qt_example issue
and a Mac OS X build issue t
Hi Alan,
will do.
Regards,
Arjen
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>
> Hi Arjen:
>
> Thanks for this information.
>
> I have attempted to incorporate the information above and everything else you
> have
> said about your three different test
20 matches
Mail list logo
