Re: [Plplot-devel] Trying to understand how git workflow for CMake is enforced

> > @Everybody: > Instead of writing a rebase workflow document myself that we could > use, I have been looking for something like that written by someone > else. What do you think of adopting (the quite restrictive) rebase > workflow outlined in >

Re: [Plplot-devel] Trying to understand how git workflow for CMake is enforced

On 2014-08-21 06:20-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote: >> >> @Everybody: >> Instead of writing a rebase workflow document myself that we could >> use, I have been looking for something like that written by someone >> else. What do you think of adopting (the quite restrictive) rebase >> workflow outlined in

[Plplot-devel] Our git repo is now live at SourceForge!

On 2014-08-21 10:26-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2014-08-21 06:20-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote: > >>> >>> @Everybody: >>> Instead of writing a rebase workflow document myself that we could >>> use, I have been looking for something like that written by someone >>> else. What do you think of adopting

Re: [Plplot-devel] Fwd: Re: [Plplot-core] git conversion status

On 2014-08-17 11:00-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: >>> To make this file proposal concrete, I am suggesting storing the file >>> in PLplot_repo_information/README_svn2git_conversion (a directory and >>> name that are unlikely to be deleted by accident by anyone) that >>> states the commands we used to

Re: [Plplot-devel] Our git repo is now live at SourceForge!

Note, this is highly recommended for all PLplot core developers as well as others here who want to actively follow PLplot development. If you did not automatically get an e-mail with subject line "[plplot:plplot] [f55848] - Alan W. Irwin: Add copy of test_ada." corresponding to my recent push to o