Hi Jim
I fully agree that the plplot coordinate system is rather a mess.
There are talks of units of mm in various places device coordinates,
which as you have implied are not really device coordinates because
the drivers report larger values to give good resolution. We discussed
this a month or so
Hi Phil:
I am testing current master tip (c3fed1f, "Undid changes"), but
that recent commit from you has not fixed the intermittent memory
issue. To illustrate, here is a run of repeat attempts for standard
example 1, where the first 3 are fine, but the last one failed:
software@raven> examp
Hi Alan
Thanks for that. I tested under Windows and Linux and saw no issues, but I
guess that was fluke.
Out of interest is it possible you have more than one instance of wxPLViewer
running at once? I wonder if the memory maps could be clashing.
I will look into this as a matter of urgency
Phil
On 2015-02-21 18:06- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Alan
> Thanks for that. I tested under Windows and Linux and saw no issues, but I
> guess that was fluke.
> Out of interest is it possible you have more than one instance of
wxPLViewer running at once? I wonder if the memory maps could be
clash
Hi Phil:
I have just opened https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/151/ to keep
track of the various issues (either due to plbuf or wxwidgets)
that show up by exercising the various standard examples with -dev
wxwidgets. I have tried to merge all issues that have been mentioned
on list that my exp
Cheers Alan
Thanks for the check for multiple instances.
I have done a similar thing already on Trello so I have a list of
items. I will knock them off as I go on the bug report too.
Phil
On 21 February 2015 at 19:40, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Hi Phil:
>
> I have just opened https://sourceforge.ne
Hi all
This may not be an ideal time to bring this up, but if I don't do it
now I will probably forget.
Basically the rebase workflow is causing me some real problems trying
to use multiple machines to test my changes. I have a Windows laptop,
which is my main machine, then I have also been tryin
Hi Alan
I have fixed the valgrind warning. It turned out to be nothing much
just checking characters after the \0 in a string, but before the end
of the memory allocation and replacing them with random letters if
they were ?. It saw all characters after the \0 as uninitialized. See
my latest commit
On 2015-02-21 21:25- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Alan
> I have fixed the valgrind warning. It turned out to be nothing much
> just checking characters after the \0 in a string, but before the end
> of the memory allocation and replacing them with random letters if
> they were ?. It saw all char
On 2015-02-21 20:53- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi all
> This may not be an ideal time to bring this up, but if I don't do it
> now I will probably forget.
>
> Basically the rebase workflow is causing me some real problems trying
> to use multiple machines to test my changes. I have a Windows lap
On Feb 21, 2015, at 4:59 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2015-02-21 20:53- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> Basically the rebase workflow is causing me some real problems trying
>> to use multiple machines to test my changes. I have a Windows laptop,
>> which is my main machine, then I have also bee
11 matches
Mail list logo
