Hi Alan
How would you like me to deal with any further wxWidgets bugs this week?
I would guess that anything contained within the wxWidgets driver
would be okay, however a number of those bugs are plbuffer related.
For example I have just fixed the rotation problem with example 3. I
turned out tha
On 2015-02-23 09:54- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Alan
> How would you like me to deal with any further wxWidgets bugs this week?
>
> I would guess that anything contained within the wxWidgets driver
> would be okay, however a number of those bugs are plbuffer related.
> For example I have just
I had the same problem with "git am" (which uses "git apply" from what I
understand). I did a "git fetch" and "git merge" before "git am"
bash-3.2$ git am --whitespace=warn ../mbox
Applying: Redesigned wxWidgets Driver
/Volumes/home/Users/jim/Development/plplot/plplot-plplot/.git/rebase-apply
On Feb 23, 2015, at 12:23 AM, "Alan W. Irwin" wrote:
> On 2015-02-22 22:04-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
>
> The ctest and cmake commands are part of what you get when you build
> the CMake software package. So I presume you did have success
> building CMake and that is a really good result.
>
> Wha
Should I use wxWidgets 2.8 or 3.0?
On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Jim Dishaw wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2015, at 12:23 AM, "Alan W. Irwin"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-02-22 22:04-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
>>
>> The ctest and cmake commands are part of what you get when you build
>> the CMake software pack
Hi Alan
Based on your comments I have just pushed a fix for the orientation
problem. I tested the results on Centos as well as Windows and on xwin
as well as wxWidgets. This change actually improves the xwin results,
giving consistent aspect ratios on replots - please check x03 to see
the improveme
> Should I use wxWidgets 2.8 or 3.0?
Hi Jim, either should work. I have 3.0 on my windows pc, 2.8 on my Centos pc
and I'm not sure on my Ubuntu pc, but I think 3.0.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: "Jim Dishaw"
Sent: 23/02/2015 15:51
To: "Alan W. Irwin" ; "Phil Rosenberg"
Cc: "PLplot
On 2015-02-23 10:37-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
I had the same problem with "git am" (which uses "git apply" from what I understand). I did a "git
fetch" and "git merge" before "git am"
bash-3.2$ git am --whitespace=warn ../mbox
Applying: Redesigned wxWidgets Driver
/Volumes/home/Users/jim/Devel
On 2015-02-23 10:48-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2015, at 12:23 AM, "Alan W. Irwin"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-02-22 22:04-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
>>
>> The ctest and cmake commands are part of what you get when you build
>> the CMake software package. So I presume you did have success
>> bu
Hi Alan and Jim
I just tested the patch on my Centos machine and got the following build error
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib64/libltdl.so', needed by
`src/libplplot.so.12.0.1'. Stop.
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/plplot.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [utils/CMakeFiles/wxPLViewer.d
On 2015-02-23 16:05- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Alan
> Based on your comments I have just pushed a fix for the orientation
> problem. I tested the results on Centos as well as Windows and on xwin
> as well as wxWidgets. This change actually improves the xwin results,
> giving consistent aspect
Alan,
I've done some preliminary testing on Ubuntu 14.10 (Utopic), including
running test_diff_psc as documented the other day, and test_interactive /
test_c_wxwidgets.
All builds fine. test_diff_psc differences are as expected. Some slight
variations when testing with svg rather than psc dev
On 2015-02-23 21:51- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Alan and Jim
> I just tested the patch on my Centos machine and got the following build error
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib64/libltdl.so', needed by
> `src/libplplot.so.12.0.1'. Stop.
>
> make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/plplot.di
On 2015-02-23 14:06-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> However, as a top priority could you finalize the fix in a
> cross-platform way for the randomized name issue? I worked pretty
> hard on that to make a nanosecond timer patch that works for the
> Debian stable case, but most of the rest of it (test
On 2015-02-23 22:33- Andrew Ross wrote:
> 3) The cmake based build of the examples in the install tree does not work
> if installed in a non-standard location (i.e. not /usr/local/). Setting
> CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX as suggested in the cmake error message makes it work,
> but not sure whether th
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:14:48PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2015-02-23 22:33- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >3) The cmake based build of the examples in the install tree does not work
> >if installed in a non-standard location (i.e. not /usr/local/). Setting
> >CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX as suggested
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:35:47PM +, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:14:48PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> > On 2015-02-23 22:33- Andrew Ross wrote:
> >
> > >3) The cmake based build of the examples in the install tree does not work
> > >if installed in a non-standard locatio
On 2015-02-23 22:33- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> Alan,
>
> I've done some preliminary testing on Ubuntu 14.10 (Utopic), including
> running test_diff_psc as documented the other day, and test_interactive /
> test_c_wxwidgets.
>
> All builds fine. test_diff_psc differences are as expected. Some slig
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:55:50PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2015-02-23 22:33- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >
> > Alan,
> >
> > I've done some preliminary testing on Ubuntu 14.10 (Utopic), including
> > running test_diff_psc as documented the other day, and test_interactive /
> > test_c_wxwidget
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:55:50PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2015-02-23 22:33- Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> >
> > Alan,
> >
> > I've done some preliminary testing on Ubuntu 14.10 (Utopic), including
> > running test_diff_psc as documented the other day, and test_interactive /
> > test_c_wxwidget
20 matches
Mail list logo
