On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:28:20PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2009-01-07 06:23+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
So, I reckon the Tcl examples now all give a perfect match
(at least with Tcl 8.5), only example 19 is still missing.
Hi Arjen:
I confirm the perfect (except for missing ex 19)
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:28:20PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2009-01-07 06:23+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
So, I reckon the Tcl examples now all give a perfect match
(at least with Tcl 8.5), only example 19 is still missing.
Hi Arjen:
I confirm the perfect (except for missing ex 19)
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:02:06PM +0100, Werner Smekal wrote:
Hi Andrew and Alan,
Would it be straightforward to implement a -stream command-line option that
means all subsequent options refer to the specified stream number? That
would provide an elegant solution to the example 14 issue
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 at 06:23:06 (+0100) Arjen Markus writes:
On 2009-01-05 10:33+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
Now, there are still the strange deviations in example 11. I am not
sure how to proceed here - probably the same stubbornness as for
example 20 is required :).
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:32:17AM +, Andrew Ross wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:28:20PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2009-01-07 06:23+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
So, I reckon the Tcl examples now all give a perfect match
(at least with Tcl 8.5), only example 19 is still missing.
With some initial help from me, Andrew has just finished integrating example
17 into our tests. That finishes the work of integrating our existing
examples into the tests.
Here is the current example status (determined running make test in the
installed examples tree) for my Debian testing
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 04:32:54PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
IIRC, octave was perfect before (except for missing ex 19) for me and
Andrew's commit messages for example 21 imply that example was previously
perfect for him. Thus, I believe the octave issue for example 21 has been
recently
tcl
Missing examples: 17 19
Differing postscript output :
Missing stdout :
Differing stdout:
The API exercised by example 19 is not straightforward to implement, but
it's been done for Fortran (both f77 and f95) so hopefully somebody will
Hi Andrew,
I woke up this morning and realised the cause of this. Currently
test_octave.sh runs all the tests from a single octave process. I
suspect this is the cause since plrandd is now used in 2 examples (17
and 21) and so example 21 will give different results now since the
random
