Jim (J):
It appears (to me) that I've fixed bug 1135 (alt text or [IMG] not shown in
table cells). If you can confirm this, I'll close the bug.
Christopher R. Hawks
HAWKSoft
-
The ability to watch M*A*S*H on demand
New version of plucker unicode patch. This one is combined,
contains patches for both python parser and viewer.
Highlits:
parser:
requires python2.0
--charset option is gone, superceeded by --input-charset and
--output-charset
you can select anything as --output-charset, characters from
I was wondering if it might not be a nice thing to have better handling of
missing images. Currently, Plucker just crashes.
Why bother? Well, suppose I download a large Plucker database, but don't
need the images. This way, I could delete all the images from the pdb (on
the desktop) and still
I am working on PalmImagePlugin.py to recognize when an image really is
monochrome to downgrade the bpp for that image.
--
Dr. Alexander R. Pruss
Department of Philosophy
Georgetown University
Washington, DC 20057-1133 U.S.A.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
online papers and home page:
'Bug' 1147 resolved.
Compile time switch added '--enable-reutrntoapp'. Library and viewer both
act the same way.
Christopher R. Hawks
HAWKSoft
-
In most countries selling harmful things like drugs is punishable.
Then
you can select anything as --output-charset, characters from
--input-charset that cannot be represented in --output-charset
are included as unicode values - this is why default --output-charset
is ascii, rather than palmos.
Having default output charset not be palmos will make searching
From: David A. Desrosiers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It should be possible to remove the Click here for the %s part
section from the viewer's view, when set to seamless mode.
Yes, it could be done. But I am not sure we should do it. First of all, it
is possible that a document might actually contain a
Alexander R. Pruss wrote:
Is the parser smart enough to notice that an image that is being processed
is black-and-white only, and to downgrade to 2-bit color even if the default
image depth is higher? If not, it should be. :-)
Alex
Can't tell you what the current version does, but I seem to
---Reply to mail from Alexander R. Pruss about multiimage format
DBFormat.html doesn't seem to describe the multiimage format, does it? Alex
It does now. 8^) It makes sense to me, but, I know how it works.
---End reply
Christopher R. Hawks
HAWKSoft
