RE: document list refresh versus document parsing time

2003-07-26 Thread Dennis McCunney
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael > Nordstrom > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 3:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: document list refresh versus document parsing time > > On Sat, Jul 26,

Re: document list refresh versus document parsing time

2003-07-26 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003, Dennis McCunney wrote: > Let us know when a beta with this mod is available for > download. I have attached a binary to bug case #727. /Mike ___ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/l

RE: document list refresh versus document parsing time

2003-07-26 Thread Dennis McCunney
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael > Nordstrom > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 12:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: document list refresh versus document parsing time > > On Sat, Jul 19,

Re: document list refresh versus document parsing time

2003-07-26 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Dennis McCunney wrote: > It's almost as > though the viewer is doing a refresh documents operation despite the > Manual Update setting, rather than simply redisplaying the info in the > plkrdoclist file. Well, my initial tests indicates that the slower response is because of

Re: document list refresh versus document parsing time

2003-07-19 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Eugene Y. Vasserman wrote: > If this has been discussed before, my apologies... > I noticed that in the CVS version of the viewer, the time it takes to > load any given document is SIGNIFICANTLY decreased (fater loading), but > the time it takes to update the document list ever

RE: document list refresh versus document parsing time

2003-07-19 Thread Dennis McCunney
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eugene Y. > Vasserman > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 3:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: document list refresh versus document parsing time > I noticed that in the CVS version of the viewer, the ti