Dennis McCunney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not entirely a myth, unfortunately.
Show me the numbers. Real numbers, not the abstract estimates of publishers
associations. Find a particular piece of restricted work and detect a
disturbance in the sales series at the point where an illegally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is my first and probably my last word on the subject.
On Saturday, Oct 5, 2002, at 18:56 Australia/Canberra, MJ Ray wrote:
Why does an artist want to cooperate with large corporations and make
criminals out of people who appreciate their
Terence Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why I disagree with the GPL as well as any DRM schemes, because
it forces authors down a certain path. [...]
You misunderstand the GPL's effect on author's rights. The GPL is only
concerned with guaranteeing all future users the same rights as
Dennis McCunney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But most of the folks I know at the moment are writers, artists, and
musicians trying to make a living out of what is essentially intellectual
property, who are _directly_ hurt by unrestricted sharing of thier
copyrighted work. I'm not concerned about
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MJ Ray
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 4:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intellectual property (was: owner_id_build vs.
copyprevention_bit)
Dennis McCunney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael
Nordstrom
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Intellectual property (was: owner_id_build vs.
copyprevention_bit)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002, Dennis
