Better solution: set up a directory server. Configure each machine to
use LDAP for user authentication, instead of local password files.
This is a more scalable (not to mention more enterprise-grade)
solution.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ian Dexter R. Marquez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
yes compression will probably slow things down most of the time, for disk.
but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_compression#Performance_Impacts
and compression is used for saving space MOST of the time, if there is
a speed increase then it probably is a [rare] positive side-effect.
google
http://www.ph-lwug.org/
_
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
On 4/20/08, Winelfred G. Pasamba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
google probably compresses their cached versions of webpages to
primarily save disk space.
(http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html)
they did as what their paper stated :- they compress and stored after
they mining it..
isn't this an off-shoot of tipid pc?
2008/4/20 Ariz Jacinto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.ph-lwug.org/
i find their choice of adjective for windows interesting. flexible? hmm...
--
`..^..' eric pareja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) lpic-2 | software freedom for all
|(e)| gnu linux python debian edu
5 matches
Mail list logo