On 5/20/2010 1:04 PM, Merrill Oveson wrote:
>
> .15/GB/month so 500GB = $75 per month.
>
> Anybody know a web based solution that works similarly (I don't need
> the added bandwidth, the promise, etc) to S3, only is less expensive,
> dare I say .01/GB/month?
>
>
I'm sure that there's somebody
What about mozy?
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 01:29 PM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
> > You could give S4 a try:
> >
> > http://www.supersimplestorageservice.com/
>
> Ugh... the site looks real enough to fool some people out of their
> money. The site's arrog
On 05/20/2010 01:29 PM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
> You could give S4 a try:
>
> http://www.supersimplestorageservice.com/
Ugh... the site looks real enough to fool some people out of their
money. The site's arrogance is disgusting. Does Jeremy not know that
"write-only" and "write-once" are ofte
On 5/20/10 2:43 PM, Mr Ritter wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mr Ritter wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Matthew Walkerwrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 2:14 pm, Michael Torrie wrote:
>>>
On 05/20/2010 01:29 PM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mr Ritter wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Matthew Walker wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 2:14 pm, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> > On 05/20/2010 01:29 PM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
>> >> You could give S4 a try:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.supersimplestorageservic
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Matthew Walker wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 2:14 pm, Michael Torrie wrote:
> > On 05/20/2010 01:29 PM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
> >> You could give S4 a try:
> >>
> >> http://www.supersimplestorageservice.com/
> >
>
Quoted from website, "Our market research indi
On Thu, May 20, 2010 2:14 pm, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 01:29 PM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
>> You could give S4 a try:
>>
>> http://www.supersimplestorageservice.com/
>
> I think just backing up to /dev/null is probably cheaper and quite a bit
> faster, since it will all be local data tr
On 05/20/2010 01:29 PM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
> You could give S4 a try:
>
> http://www.supersimplestorageservice.com/
I think just backing up to /dev/null is probably cheaper and quite a bit
faster, since it will all be local data transfer and not over the
internet. /dev/null seems to have qui
> You could give S4 a try:
>
> http://www.supersimplestorageservice.com/
Perfect! I'm going to migrate ALL of my data storage to them!
--
Matthew Walker HAM Call Sign: KF7JLF
Kydance Hosting & Consulting, Inc. - http://www.kydance.net/
PHP, Perl, and Web Development - Li
On 20 May 2010, at 13:04, Merrill Oveson wrote:
> Plug:
>
> We use S3 a ton. It works great and I love it.
>
> It has relieved disk space pressure from web and file servers.
>
> Now, I'm in a situation where I need to archive old data from my file server.
> I like how S3 works, the only probl
Plug:
We use S3 a ton. It works great and I love it.
It has relieved disk space pressure from web and file servers.
Now, I'm in a situation where I need to archive old data from my file server.
I like how S3 works, the only problem is that S3 is too expensive to
use just for archival storage.
11 matches
Mail list logo