I have never seen this as a default and I have been administrating
exchange servers for a very long time. That said there are ways you
can make exchange do this. It is a performance option but to the best
of my memory it is not a user option - your exchange administrator
will have to fix it for you
I need to connect to an Exchange server for email at work but, having a
Linux desktop, I do so via IMAP using Thunderbird (or KMail and, every
so often, Evolution). This works mostly okay. The one part that
doesn't work is that the IMAP server part of Exchange completely strips
off all format
ACL's or Access Control Lists show up in every corner of the digital
world Here we are looking at file ACL's which have been built in to
linux for at least half a decade (and optional well before that)
First thing you need to do is enable them by editing /etc/fstab and
appending acl to your partit
I second that! But if some one who does find LDAP easy wishes to put
together a how to I am more then willing to try and change my mind on
that.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Jason Holtzapple wrote:
> On 09/13/2010 08:13 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> There is Ldap actually which is quite good, just ne
On 09/13/2010 08:13 PM, Stephen wrote:
> There is Ldap actually which is quite good, just need to determine how
> to set it up.
> wrote:
>> Otherwise linux does not have (to the best of my knowledge)
>> easy central account management.
I think the key word here was "easy" for which LDAP doesn't
There is Ldap actually which is quite good, just need to determine how
to set it up.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Bryan O'Neal
wrote:
> I agree with everything I have seen in this thread so far. If you are
> a seasoned windows admin you can use Active Directory for central user
> authenticati
Bryan,
The detail would be great. I would like to learn more about ACL support.
Thank you
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Bryan O'Neal <
bryan.on...@theonealandassociates.com> wrote:
> I agree with everything I have seen in this thread so far. If you are
> a seasoned windows admin you can use
Just as a note, the burgers event is tomorrow night. If you want to go
please use the following link to make a reservation
http://www.eventbrite.com/event/818812089
Please feel free to attend both events as they are gear for different
crowds, tomorrow night is more for the people that into cars a
I agree with everything I have seen in this thread so far. If you are
a seasoned windows admin you can use Active Directory for central user
authentication and file level access with only about 10 -15 min worth
of work. Otherwise linux does not have (to the best of my knowledge)
easy central accoun
Local Motors hosts the Software Freedom Day (SFD) Phoenix area event by
providing a tour of Local-Motors' Chandler Micro-Factory on Thursday,
September 16th at 18:30.
Local Motors uses Creative Commons licensing for car and part designs
giving owners and third party parts manufacturers full so
James Dugger wrote:
I checked the RAID configuration again and it is controlled with Ubuntu
and not the MB. I configured the RAID as a part of the installation of
Server 10.04.
Good. You should see your array status with:
$ cat /proc/mdstat
> SMB and CIFS are pretty much the same thing. I
Eric,
Thanks for your comments. Just as a followup here are responses and a
couple of addtional questions and items for clarification.
> I think you want to disable RAID on the MB, and let Linux handle the raid
> processing (aka software raid). I'm not sure what happens with the
> configuration
PLUG Linux Security Team will be presenting Professional Videos from Defcon
18 over the next 10 months,
The Videos are excellent quality purchased at the con and include speaker
and overheaf with high quality audio.
http://plug.phoenix.az.us
See you there!
--
Office: (602)239-3392
AT&T: (50
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike Ballon wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have the need to setup a reverse proxy to front-end some websites for
> security reasons, but I can't decide whether to use Apache or Squid. The
> only real requirements are to having something "more secure" than your
> stan
I have seen Ubuntu do freakishly well in running on these on-board
raid configurations, My first experience was with an Intel matrix
storage IF on my Intel mainboard, ansd it works like a champ. I do not
know the ins and outs of it as i went back to windows (long story best
left for another thread)
James Dugger wrote:
I'm new to PLUG and new to LINUX but I have jumped in head first. By
head first I mean I have removed XP off of 4 desktops and Vista off my
HP Pavilion dv9000 laptop and installed Ubuntu 10.04 i386 on each. I
have built an new headless server with and AMD Athelon (tripple co
I'm new to PLUG and new to LINUX but I have jumped in head first. By
head first I mean I have removed XP off of 4 desktops and Vista off my
HP Pavilion dv9000 laptop and installed Ubuntu 10.04 i386 on each. I
have built an new headless server with and AMD Athelon (tripple core)
64bit chip and 2GB
I quit using M$ after my eyes became unusable for even large print. I Haven't
tried NVDA (an open source speech synth for windows) yet. However that doesn't
matter now as I use a mac with voiceover. I spent just under $400 for a used
Imac intel machine and purchased snow leopard for $29.00 from
It gets better yet.
With Vbox, when Windows is running (and eating some system resources), it's
getting it's internet feed from Ubuntu which in turn is acting like a
software firewall from hell.
The XP (or whatever version you want, XP is really best though) virtual
machine lives on a single file
This is great. I'll tell you the same thing I tell others. Using M$ is like
hitting yourself in the head with a hammer. It just feels so good when you
stop. I kicked the M$ dust off my shoes years ago and never looked back. And
never regretted it either.
Good luck, man.
My $0.02.
Tim B.
That is cool!!
So you are only using the apps you can only run under windows, like IE. You do
all your browsing and email using Linux so you are less vulnerable to malware,
rootkits, and all the other junk that is our there.
Nice!!
Keith Smith
--- On Mon, 9/13/10,
Even better, VBox has a mode called seamless mode. I need Vision every so
often, so I have XP in a vbox instance. I have an icon on my desktop that
uses the command line interface to start the Windows instance on demand,
otherwise why waste the resources. When I first set ut up, Windows came up
So basically I install my favorite distro of Linux. Download and install the
compatible version of virtualbox. Then install XP in the virtualbox.
Would I be able to open an instance of XP in a window? Like opening multiple
browser tabs? That way I would be able to go back and forth between
I also run virtualbox for IE testing. I run tinyxp, which runs blazing fast
(not that i've done any benchmarking...)
2010/9/13 Roderick Ford
> I keep a WinXP box running in a vm on my Fedora 7 (yes, due to be
> upgraded), then anytime I need windows I can just use KRDC to show the
> desktop and
Nope. You do need the kernel headers/devel installed though.
I love the import/export appliance feature.. running the same XP Virtualbox
clone on 4 machines [Corporate Edition] :) The main difference I see
between the community edition (in rpm repository) and the non community
edition is USB sup
Very interesting idea. Does virtualbox requires a 64bit CPU?
Keith Smith
--- On Mon, 9/13/10, Roderick Ford wrote:
From: Roderick Ford
Subject: Re: OT: and not OT: Avira Rescue CD
To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
Cc: "keith smith"
Date: Monday, September 13, 2010,
I keep a WinXP box running in a vm on my Fedora 7 (yes, due to be upgraded),
then anytime I need windows I can just use KRDC to show the desktop and test
all the browsers there.
Roderick Ford
keith smith wrote:
=
I'm really getting tired of these windows problems. 2 viri
Best option would be to keep Windows relegated to a VM ...
virtualbox/qemu/vmware ... so when these problems occur, you can just
"rollback" to the snapshot and keep on working, within a minute!
There is no use wasting good hardware.
Roderick Ford
keith smith wrote:
=
Hi
On 09/12/2010 06:55 PM, Dazed_75 wrote:
> It really is best to regularly run on battery and not just run
> continusly on AC with the battery in. My HP battery life is down to
> seconds because I did that.
>
> That said, I understand more modern systems have better charge control
> circuitry to re
Id go with virtualbox on linux if web compatability is all you need windows
fot
On Sep 12, 2010 10:09 PM, "JD Austin" wrote:
I use a combination of RH13, Crossover Linux (I have v8... not sure if it's
worth paying to upgrade o v9), and Virtualbox with XP installed (rarely
needed).
On Sun, Sep 1
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 06:55:33PM -0700, Dazed_75 wrote:
> It really is best to regularly run on battery and not just run continusly on
> AC
> with the battery in. My HP battery life is down to seconds because I did
> that.
I'm running an old Dell Latitude 600 and I wonder how many
charge/disc
I'm pondering the same thing. In my case, with a vintage but potent
ATI X1700 card, I'm on Maverick now due to the late-era kernel - the
open-source ATI drivers including kernel support is a rapidly-evolving
thing.
Right now Mint/Debian is significantly behind Maverick. If that
starts to change
32 matches
Mail list logo