That is correct because really the difference is in the support of the
code and the materials surrounding it. as they are both forks of the
RHEL open source code.
For me Centos was easier to work with because it had more information
and documentation.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:34 PM, R P Herrold
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:48 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> If the patch cycle is as
>> quick as Cent/RHEL, it may be prod-ready.
>
> net patch cycles have historically track out substantially identically;
> CentOS just completed a re-engineering cycle with the 6 major release which,
> with any luck, w
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Ben Browning wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:34 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
It and CentOS are almost indistinguishable to a sysadmin who i not a
distribution builder; the remaining principal of the distribution is: Connie
Sieh, who is a friend. the other long time member rec
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:34 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> It and CentOS are almost indistinguishable to a sysadmin who i not a
> distribution builder; the remaining principal of the distribution is: Connie
> Sieh, who is a friend. the other long time member recently went to work at
> Red Hat
My und
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Ben Browning wrote:
"Its primary purpose is to reduce duplicated effort of the labs, and to
have a common install base for the various experimenters."
EG not a prod OS, in my opinion.
ehh?
It and CentOS are almost indistinguishable to a sysadmin who i
not a distribution
On 01/12/2012 02:13 PM, keith smith wrote:
Hi,
The data center where my client has several LAMP servers is suggesting
we look at http://www.ScientificLinux.org/ for our next upgrade. We
currently are using CentOS on one box and RHEL on another.
Anyone using Scientific Linux ? If so your
I think Scientific Linux is a fork of RH like CentOS, but more oriented to
stability for scientific research uses. I personally didn't like it much
and preferred CentOS. but that was some years ago..
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, keith smith wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The
has several LAMP servers is suggesting we
> look at http://www.ScientificLinux.org/ for our next upgrade. We
> currently are using CentOS on one box and RHEL on another.
>
> Anyone using Scientific Linux ? If so your experience and recommendations?
>
Hi,
The data center where my client has several LAMP servers is suggesting we look
at http://www.ScientificLinux.org/ for our next upgrade. We currently are
using CentOS on one box and RHEL on another.
Anyone using Scientific Linux ? If so your experience and recommendations?
Thank you in
