http://www.neng.usu.edu/cee/faculty/gurro/Scilab.html
can see it is *free*, now how much free is as debatable as .fr as in france
just wondering allowed/aloud!
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List:
On 22-Feb-08, at 2:50 PM, ಓಂ wrote:
http://www.neng.usu.edu/cee/faculty/gurro/Scilab.html
can see it is *free*, now how much free is as debatable as .fr as
in france
you can modify the code and use the modified code in your
organisation - but you cannot distribute the modified code -
On 22-Feb-08, at 4:20 PM, ಓಂ wrote:
They are looking at it from different perspective. And they have
every right to do that. You branding them as non-FOSS does not change
who and how they are!
*I* have not branded them - even the OSI doesn't accept their license
as a an OSS license. And
ಓಂ wrote:
that is the just the same way GNU GPL locks people down from
exploiting their's own innovations so what is different? GNU
wants to have source code of your innovations back to them... Forcing
you to give back to the place where you took idea from is still
coersive.
They are
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:50 AM, ಓಂ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is the just the same way GNU GPL locks people down from
exploiting their's own innovations so what is different? GNU
wants to have source code of your innovations back to them... Forcing
you to give back to the place
Newton did not read Devanagari to know *gurutvaakarshan* so he never
understood the *gravity* of situation!
Locking down maybe the suitable, perhaps *locking up* is better!
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List:
that is the just the same way GNU GPL locks people down from
exploiting their's own innovations so what is different? GNU
wants to have source code of your innovations back to them... Forcing
you to give back to the place where you took idea from is still
coersive.
They are looking at it
Hello,
Scilab:- Bhopatkar Madam
scilab is not FOSS - better to demo octave
If anyone using octave they are welcome.
Our concern is education and not commercial use.
FOSS=Free and/or Open Source Software that is how we see towards it.
Those who are using software with out purchasing them.
bp wrote:
Hello,
Scilab:- Bhopatkar Madam
scilab is not FOSS - better to demo octave
If anyone using octave they are welcome.
Our concern is education and not commercial use.
FOSS=Free and/or Open Source Software that is how we see towards it.
Redefining commonly understood terms to fit
ಓಂ wrote:
Yaaa... next time edit wiki before you start arguing against
something.. like some government agencies do.. :-)
Wikipedia edits have public timelines and changes can be verified easily
FYI. A simple search would yeild hundreds of other references to keep
the silliness away from
bp wrote:
Hello,
scilab is not FOSS - better to demo octave
If anyone using octave they are welcome.
Our concern is education and not commercial use.
FOSS=Free and/or Open Source Software that is how we see towards it.
Redefining commonly understood terms to fit specific agendas doesn't
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ಓಂ wrote:
Yaaa... next time edit wiki before you start arguing against
something.. like some government agencies do.. :-)
Wikipedia edits have public timelines and changes can be verified easily
FYI. A simple
Hello,
scilab is not FOSS - better to demo octave
If anyone using octave they are welcome.
Our concern is education and not commercial use.
FOSS=Free and/or Open Source Software that is how we see towards it.
Redefining commonly understood terms to fit specific agendas doesn't
seem
There has never been a better source of information than mukt (स्वैर) chintan
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in)
List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail
Yaaa... next time edit wiki before you start arguing against
something.. like some government agencies do.. :-)
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in)
List Information:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:59 AM, आदित्य (Aditya) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ಓಂ wrote:
that is the just the same way GNU GPL locks people down from
exploiting their's own innovations so what is different? GNU
wants to have source code of your innovations back to them... Forcing
माझे गणित नेहमीच कच्चे होते पण थोडे वाचन घडले तेव्हा कळले ...
अगणित करावे पुण्य तेव्हाच होते येथे जनन
--
__
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in)
List Information:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:20 PM, ಓಂ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is the just the same way GNU GPL locks people down from
exploiting their's own innovations so what is different? GNU
wants to have source code of your innovations back to them... Forcing
you to give back to the place
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22-Feb-08, at 4:20 PM, ಓಂ wrote:
They are looking at it from different perspective. And they have
every right to do that. You branding them as non-FOSS does not change
who and how they are!
*I* have
Let us think of cost of all headers that get added to each message and
their percentage ratio to actual content of the message averaged out
over the period of trimester.
That might give truer figures..
Just a thought in same direction.
--
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:17 AM, शंतनु महाजन (Shantanoo Mahajan)
wrote:
Hi Mehul,
I strongly agree with you; when only one person has issue, that person
should
set up mail filters.
That was my point.
But, I would like to draw your attention to following:
- Total number of
On 22-Feb-08, at 7:26 PM, Aditya Godbole wrote:
*I* have not branded them - even the OSI doesn't accept their
license
as a an OSS license. And i our labs we had some enthusiastic
students
who were modifying scilab - and about to release the modifications
when they found it couldnt be
Hello,
We have plan `Foss( Free and Open source software) for maths meet'
on Saturday 23rd Feb. at 4.30 to 5.30 at Bhaskaracharya Pratishthana (BP),
Pune.
www.bprim.org
Idea behind the meeting: You/ we can demonstrate free maths software which
you/we are using for
some particular work.
On 21-Feb-08, at 6:38 AM, bp wrote:
Scilab:- Bhopatkar Madam
scilab is not FOSS - better to demo octave
--
regards
kg
http://lawgon.livejournal.com
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
Foss Conference for the common man: http://registration.fossconf.in/web/
--
24 matches
Mail list logo
