Re: [pmacct-discussion] [PATCH] Minor AMQP improvements

2015-04-01 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Will, Thanks for both patches. They both make sense and will go in mainstream code. This second one i've already validated and is already applied to the code. The other one i just need some extra minimal time for QA (count it will be committed tomorrow). https://www.mail-archive.com/pmacct-com

Re: [pmacct-discussion] timestamps in the past

2015-04-01 Thread Bill Nash
Is it possible that the MySQL timestamps are set automagically by the database, as part of the insert query, completely ignoring the timestamps in the flow? On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Steffen Plotner wrote: > Hi, > > We have a Palo Alto firewall and are trying to use pmacct to collect its

[pmacct-discussion] timestamps in the past

2015-04-01 Thread Steffen Plotner
Hi, We have a Palo Alto firewall and are trying to use pmacct to collect its netflow data. I have been able to get everything to work for netflow v9 type data expect for the timestamps. Most timestamps are current and some go back one month. The wireshark trace of the netflow data does show suc

Re: [pmacct-discussion] [PATCH] Minor AMQP improvements

2015-04-01 Thread Nick Douma
Hi, On 01-04-15 05:18, Will Dowling wrote: > I forgot to address the other (more important) bug I encountered: > > * Content type is only specified for messages published when the > amqp_persistent_msg configuration option is specified. This information > should always be applied