Re: [pmacct-discussion] BGP-related fields do not show up in the memory table

2009-10-28 Thread Zenon Mousmoulas
Hi, To conclude this thread: - The association of flow records to BGP RIB via the map works just fine. As Paolo discovered, the cause of the problem I reported was a typo :( - Regarding AS 0 I haven't tried yet any solution or workaround to have our own ASN appear in pmacct tables instead.

Re: [pmacct-discussion] BGP-related fields do not show up in the memory table

2009-10-24 Thread Zenon Mousmoulas
Hi Paolo, thanks for your replies. My answers/comments follow in-line: I am exporting netflow v9 (non-aggregated, for the time being) from a Cisco router (12000/PRP with 12.0S) to nfacctd (0.12.0rc2). I have Can i ask you which 12.0S IOS version the C12k is running precisely? 12.0(33)S2

Re: [pmacct-discussion] BGP-related fields do not show up in the memory table

2009-10-23 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Zenon, Thanks very much for your feedback first of all; please follow my replies in-line. On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:23:34AM +0300, Zenon Mousmoulas wrote: I am exporting netflow v9 (non-aggregated, for the time being) from a Cisco router (12000/PRP with 12.0S) to nfacctd (0.12.0rc2). I

Re: [pmacct-discussion] BGP-related fields do not show up in the memory table

2009-10-23 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Zenon, One additional point to my previous reply. On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:23:34AM +0300, Zenon Mousmoulas wrote: I am reluctant to use 'nfacctd_as_new: bgp' RIB lookups since we probably have this information already (exporter is setup for origin-as). Very true. And it depends on your