On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 13:24 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote:
> What do you think about calling such a package
> a "hidden optional dependency"?
Hi,
I agree it's kind of hidden, having it mentioned in the README isn't
enough to make it better visible (as proved here).
Would the terminology
Hello zyx, hello all,
> On 14 August 2019 at 08:59 zyx wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 14:11 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote:
> > but Boost isn't searched for when configuring the podofo build (with
> > cmake) because it wasn't added as even an optional dependency to the
> > project.
>
>
Hi Matthew,
I resorted to the shared-library solution as it worked well for me, at
least it builds. I haven't tried to run anything as yet.
For the sake of my personal understanding
On 13/08/2019 13:40, Matthew Brincke wrote:
Then podofo was automatically configured with JPEG support and
