On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 13:24 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote:
> What do you think about calling such a package
> a "hidden optional dependency"?
Hi,
I agree it's kind of hidden, having it mentioned in the README isn't
enough to make it better visible (as proved here).
Would the terminology
Hello zyx, hello all,
> On 14 August 2019 at 08:59 zyx wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 14:11 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote:
> > but Boost isn't searched for when configuring the podofo build (with
> > cmake) because it wasn't added as even an optional dependency to the
> > project.
>
>
Hi Matthew,
I resorted to the shared-library solution as it worked well for me, at
least it builds. I haven't tried to run anything as yet.
For the sake of my personal understanding
On 13/08/2019 13:40, Matthew Brincke wrote:
Then podofo was automatically configured with JPEG support and
Hello Pietro, hello all,
> On 13 August 2019 at 12:53 Pietro Paolini
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> I spoke too early and I have another question if you don't mind me
> hammering.
>
I received your first email as second (sorted up in my mail client)
and have already answered it.
... snip
Hello Pietro, hello all,
> On 13 August 2019 at 12:27 Pietro Paolini
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks a lot for your answer, I am not bothered at all and I am more
> than happy to stay on trunk - I just intended to flag this up.
> I've also found that the example "pdfcontentsgraph" is
Hi Matthew,
Thanks a lot for your answer, I am not bothered at all and I am more
than happy to stay on trunk - I just intended to flag this up.
I've also found that the example "pdfcontentsgraph" is not built as part
of the main build.
Thanks,
P.
On 12/08/2019 23:36, Matthew Brincke
Hi Matthew,
I spoke too early and I have another question if you don't mind me
hammering.
I've written a very simple program to check the PdfTokenizer however it
fails to compile as some external dependencies seem to be missing.
int main(int argn, char **argv) {
[...]
Hello Pietro, hello all,
> On 12 August 2019 at 23:24 Pietro Paolini
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've stumbled upon this library only a few days ago and I noticed that
> the downloadable version from
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6.tar.gz/download
>
Hi all,
I've stumbled upon this library only a few days ago and I noticed that
the downloadable version from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6.tar.gz/download
Does not compile, at least on my system, while what I get right off
trunk does compile.
I am
