On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 18:41 +0200, Arno Gramatke wrote:
> I don’t know which would be the best approach to go on with this.
> Uli’s additional patches are certainly a good addition and obviously
> needed when using Lua 5.2. But we should keep compatibility with Lua
> 5.1, too. Otherwise it wouldn’t
Hi all,
it looks like I finally get my virtual machines running early next week. I can
the test compilation from SVN for Homebrew on Lion, Mountain Lion and
Mavericks. I will let you know the results.
Homebrew is still on Lua 5.1, MacPorts is on 5.2 (I think). From what I
gathered from Lua's w
Dne 17.5.2014 2:22, Kunda Loves Scribus napsal(a):
> Sorry, forgot to mention that FYI, there is an instruction made here:
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/pull/26888#issuecomment-43287592
> for Hombrew users that are trying to compile podofo. This is the patch
> that I've been using so far.
Sorry, forgot to mention that FYI, there is an instruction made here:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/pull/26888#issuecomment-43287592 for
Hombrew users that are trying to compile podofo. This is the patch that
I've been using so far.
I'm mentioning this here for others that are searching for
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Uli Zappe wrote:
> Am 15.05.2014 um 23:25 schrieb Kunda Loves Scribus >:
>
> > Arno & Uli,
> >
> > Which patch will it be?
>
> Well, my patch seems to comprise all the others, *but* it needs Lua 5.2,
> which Homebrew doesn't seem to offer.
>
> I feel that Homebre
Am 15.05.2014 um 23:25 schrieb Kunda Loves Scribus :
> Arno & Uli,
>
> Which patch will it be?
Well, my patch seems to comprise all the others, *but* it needs Lua 5.2, which
Homebrew doesn't seem to offer.
I feel that Homebrew should be updated to Lua 5.2, rather than Podofo
implementing a wo
Arno & Uli,
Which patch will it be?
/Kunda
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, zyx wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:03 -0500, Kunda Loves Scribus wrote:
> > Thanks so much for having the conversation. I'm checking in to see if
> > there is any progress in the assessment, tweeking and integratio
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:03 -0500, Kunda Loves Scribus wrote:
> Thanks so much for having the conversation. I'm checking in to see if
> there is any progress in the assessment, tweeking and integration of
> patches which can fix these issues that have cropped up for OSX
> Homebrew Package Manager b
Arno, Uli, zyx, et al
Thanks so much for having the conversation. I'm checking in to see if there
is any progress in the assessment, tweeking and integration of patches
which can fix these issues that have cropped up for OSX Homebrew Package
Manager builds?
Thanks so much for your attention, time
Am 11.05.2014 um 18:41 schrieb Arno Gramatke :
> It looks like Uli worked on a PoDoFo release version
Yep, that's correct; I used the latest release available. Then I applied
several patches I found elsewhere on the net and finally added what wasn't
covered by any existing patch.
Bye
Uli
s
Hi everybody,
the fourth URL from Kunde is actually my patch that has been committed by you
some weeks ago. So it’s already included. Thing is that there is no new release
for PoDoFo and therefore people using Homebrew don’t get those patches.
Without those patches PoDoFo is broken on all three
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 08:22 -0500, Kunda Loves Scribus wrote:
> I humbly ask of you to please fix this. it breaks for OSX mountain
> Lion when compiling with Homebrew. There is a patch (4th URL) that can
> be applied but the problem is anyone with Mountain Lion who tries to
> compile podofo on Hom
Folks,
I humbly ask of you to please fix this. it breaks for OSX mountain Lion
when compiling with Homebrew. There is a patch (4th URL) that can be
applied but the problem is anyone with Mountain Lion who tries to compile
podofo on Homebrew reports an error without patch.
Thank you for you attent
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Kunda Loves Scribus wrote:
> Any followup on this? People who use MacOSX Homebrew package manager are
> not able to compile based on this bug. Please advise.
> Thanks!
>
> /Kunda
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Kunda Loves Scribus <
> scribus.u...@gmail.
Any followup on this? People who use MacOSX Homebrew package manager are
not able to compile based on this bug. Please advise.
Thanks!
/Kunda
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Kunda Loves Scribus wrote:
> Hello Podofo team,
>
> Just want to re-visit this thread from an upstream bug report:
> ht
Hello Podofo team,
Just want to re-visit this thread from an upstream bug report:
https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/mailman/message/32039124/
This is the thread that started it:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/pull/26888
This is the current homebrew formula that pulls the broken version:
htt
16 matches
Mail list logo
