Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-14 Thread zyx
On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 13:24 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > What do you think about calling such a package > a "hidden optional dependency"? Hi, I agree it's kind of hidden, having it mentioned in the README isn't enough to make it better visible (as proved here). Would the terminology

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-14 Thread Matthew Brincke
Hello zyx, hello all, > On 14 August 2019 at 08:59 zyx wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 14:11 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > but Boost isn't searched for when configuring the podofo build (with > > cmake) because it wasn't added as even an optional dependency to the > > project. > >

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-14 Thread zyx
On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 14:11 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > but Boost isn't searched for when configuring the podofo build (with > cmake) because it wasn't added as even an optional dependency to the > project. Hi, are you sure of that? See:

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-14 Thread Pietro Paolini
Hi Matthew, I resorted to the shared-library solution as it worked well for me, at least it builds. I haven't tried to run anything as yet. For the sake of my personal understanding On 13/08/2019 13:40, Matthew Brincke wrote: Then podofo was automatically configured with JPEG support and

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-13 Thread Matthew Brincke
Hello Pietro, hello all, > On 13 August 2019 at 12:53 Pietro Paolini > wrote: > > > Hi Matthew, > > I spoke too early and I have another question if you don't mind me > hammering. > I received your first email as second (sorted up in my mail client) and have already answered it. ... snip

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-13 Thread Matthew Brincke
Hello Pietro, hello all, > On 13 August 2019 at 12:27 Pietro Paolini > wrote: > > > Hi Matthew, > > Thanks a lot for your answer, I am not bothered at all and I am more > than happy to stay on trunk - I just intended to flag this up. > I've also found that the example "pdfcontentsgraph" is

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-13 Thread Pietro Paolini
Hi Matthew, Thanks a lot for your answer, I am not bothered at all and I am more than happy to stay on trunk - I just intended to flag this up. I've also found that the example "pdfcontentsgraph" is not built as part of the main build. Thanks, P. On 12/08/2019 23:36, Matthew Brincke

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-13 Thread Pietro Paolini
Hi Matthew, I spoke too early and I have another question if you don't mind me hammering. I've written a very simple program to check the PdfTokenizer however it fails to compile as some external dependencies seem to be missing. int main(int argn, char **argv) { [...]

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

2019-08-12 Thread Matthew Brincke
Hello Pietro, hello all, > On 12 August 2019 at 23:24 Pietro Paolini > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I've stumbled upon this library only a few days ago and I noticed that > the downloadable version from > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6.tar.gz/download >