On Feb 22, 2004, at 9:31 PM, Rocco Caputo wrote:
...
Thinking things through, it also allows POE::Kernel to possibly export
functions that look and feel like built-ins. So we get the
possibility of a fourth idiom:
use POE::Kernel qw(delay);
delay(...);
This idea squicks me out, but I figured
First, yeah. Squick city.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:31:41PM -0500, Rocco Caputo wrote:
> So someone unclear on the $_[KERNEL] concept needed some help with it
> on IRC. They wanted to call a function that set a delay in the
> current session, but they didn't understand that $_[KERNEL] is a
> r
So someone unclear on the $_[KERNEL] concept needed some help with it
on IRC. They wanted to call a function that set a delay in the
current session, but they didn't understand that $_[KERNEL] is a
reference to an object (a singleton) and didn't magically appear in
called subroutines.
For example
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:06:35PM -0800, Tim Wood wrote:
>
> I'd like to continue following the discussion, but the effort of
> clearing out old msgs. makes me want to quit. Can someone (Rocco?)
> make this 2 min. change?
I can't make it myself, but I know who to ask to do it. Adding [POE]
to
I'd like to continue following the discussion, but the effort of clearing out old
msgs. makes me want to quit. Can someone (Rocco?) make this 2 min. change?
Thx,
TW
> "Rocco" == Rocco Caputo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rocco> Added to the plan:
Rocco> At some point, the cookbook and possibly the tutorials should be
Rocco> bundled into CPAN distributions. Perhaps POE::Tutorials or
Rocco> POE::Examples, so the low-tech and high-altitude crowds can a
Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 07:44:28AM -0800, Exide Arabellan wrote:
Im working on a module that utilizes POE::Component::Server::TCP. Being
the neat freak that i am, im inclined to name the module
POE::Component::Server::TCP::MUD, though it seems rather cumbersome.
I've seen ot
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:49:53AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Rocco" == Rocco Caputo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rocco> POE still ships with about 200K of samples, and it will continue to
> Rocco> until they're replaced by cookbook recipes or tutorials. The plans
> Rocco> have
Rocco Caputo wrote:
The heavy development discussions may be scaring people off. Is it
time to split the list into development and questions tracks?
Proposed options (revise and amend as necessary):
1. No. It's too early to tell.
This would be my suggestion.
2. Yes.
a. Move the help/questio
> "Rocco" == Rocco Caputo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rocco> POE still ships with about 200K of samples, and it will continue to
Rocco> until they're replaced by cookbook recipes or tutorials. The plans
Rocco> have been on display for months at
Rocco> http://poe.perl.org/?POE_RFCs/Deprecate_S
10 matches
Mail list logo
