I propose a common nomenclature.
I never like reverse Hungarian notation and variants because invariably you
end up with names that don't describe the datatype well, or you end up with
long names, and I hate long names.
I think names should be functional: state describes the thing without
On (08/06 01:50), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me through my vote in for POEx.
Agreed. i like POEx a lot. makes it very clear what is in core and what
is not.
--
sungo
http://eekeek.org
On (08/06 01:57), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZipEvent=$mutter
Now the point I've been raising for several years : say I want the
event posted to another session, how do I specify that?
I propose a common nomenclature.
FooState : a subroutine reference. the contents of the state to be
I like POEx also.
Philip:
If you wanted to get a postback for a certain session/event you could do:
ZipEvent = $kernel-ID_id_to_session($session_id)-postback('zip_event',@event_args),
pretty ugly and would cause an error for a session that didn't exist
I would like to suggest we use
Perhaps I'm too sentimental but I prefer names that are pronounceable.
POEx is pretty pronounceable: POE-ex
POEx
I like the brevity of this. my issue however, is that the implication is
that modules in that namespace are extensions... and I don't perceive
components as extensions... an
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:59:03 -0600 Wiggins d Anconia wrote:
+--
| I'll add another. I think at the very least POE (with the 'E') needs to
| stay intact. I know the chatting convention has been to use 'PoCo',
| but to keep the two related I think the full 'POE' spelling
Chris Fedde wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:59:03 -0600 Wiggins d Anconia wrote:
+--
| I'll add another. I think at the very least POE (with the 'E')
needs to
| stay intact. I know the chatting convention has been to use 'PoCo',
| but to keep the two related I think the full
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:17:59PM -0700, Erick Calder wrote:
Perhaps I'm too sentimental but I prefer names that are pronounceable.
POEx is pretty pronounceable: POE-ex
POEx
I like the brevity of this. my issue however, is that the implication is
that modules in that namespace are
