Re: Porting POE to Moose

2009-04-27 Thread douglasstvnsn
Ah... somebody send Evan some Syrup of Epicac. I know from alot of the JaaaVVaa programmers I have to deal with... Everything is an object to them. Well, not everything is an Object. I actually like State machines BETTER.? So think of each POE session as a state machine.? Look at

Re: POE and perl fork interaction

2009-01-15 Thread douglasstvnsn
Deven, Take a look at the Cookbook and the job control examples. While a poe kernel is a process singleton, you can have many sessions running on the same kernel. Dougie!!! -Original Message- From: Deven Parekh parekh.de...@gmail.com To: douglasstv...@aol.com Cc:

Re: POE and perl fork interaction

2009-01-14 Thread douglasstvnsn
This got me to thinking Setup a POE::Wheel::Followtail for each? file you want to tail.? No need to spawn off other processes. If you DO need separate processes, from the main process run a POE::Wheel::Run and start another kernel on that process.? Setup a Followtail wheel for the

Re: AIM/OSCAR Component?

2004-04-01 Thread DouglasStvnsn
I would love to see a copy of this myself... Dougie In a message dated 4/1/2004 5:55:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Back in August, Dan McCormick said he had written (and documented!) POE::Component::Net::OSCAR. There's call for such a beast if it still exists.

Re: Grandwheels or wheel-wheels question

2003-08-20 Thread DouglasStvnsn
Markus, Take a look at POE::Wheel::Run. Run can be initiated as spawning a separate program or subroutine. Use a ReadWrite wheel to connect the subprocess back to the Run Wheel. In the subroutine or separate script, run a kernel inside of that to handle the IO, multiwhatevers, etc. Dougie!