On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:39:51PM -0800, Erick Calder wrote:
pulling it into the core with a name like POE::Arguments
side note: my vote would go for POE::Args. one thing I've always liked
about perl and detested about Java is the length of namespaces. I for one
hate to type so shorter
some discussion about creating a
PoCo in place of POE::Component?
-Original Message-
From: Rocco Caputo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 8:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: sungo
Subject: Re: POE::Sweeten::Args
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 04:54:02PM -0500, sungo wrote
It was Monday, February 23, 2004 when sungo took the soap box, saying:
: i seem to have deleted rocco's original mail before responding to it. oh
: well.
:
: so the question is: newbies seem to not understand $_[KERNEL] and
: friends. what to do about it?
:
: my answer is this:
