Tony Cook (Mon 08/04/08 22:39):
In the spirit of POE::XS::Queue::Array, I've released
POE::XS::Loop::Poll, an implementation of POE's event loop written in
C.
I haven't done any speed benchmarks (or found any), but I expect it to
be slightly lower overhead than the built-in
Look at $poe_kernel-poe_kernel_loop();
David Davis
☄ Software Engineer
http://xant.us/
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 08:24, hideo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Cook (Mon 08/04/08 22:39):
In the spirit of POE::XS::Queue::Array, I've released
POE::XS::Loop::Poll, an implementation of POE's event
David Davis (Mon 08/04/08 12:31):
Look at $poe_kernel-poe_kernel_loop();
David Davis
a** Software Engineer
http://xant.us/
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 08:24, hideo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Cook (Mon 08/04/08 22:39):
In the spirit of POE::XS::Queue::Array,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:02:46PM +0100, Luca Garbo wrote:
Using HP-UX platform and perl 5.0053 , having previuosly installed POE
0.24 , I've tried to run tests. Select test doesn't work properly
hanging at _data_ses_refcount_inc subroutine. It happened several times
and other few times
Using HP-UX platform and perl 5.0053 , having previuosly installed POE
0.24 , I've tried to run tests. Select test doesn't work properly
hanging at _data_ses_refcount_inc subroutine. It happened several times
and other few times it's worked properly. Do you , especially Rocco,
have any
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:22:05PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote:
Second: Maybe I am misreading things a bit. It appears that the actual
level of abstraction in this system is not much higher than exists for the
current PoCo set of packages. I was hoping for something much higher
level that
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 12:15:20AM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote:
On fredag, augusti 9, 2002, at 03:33 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then go take that time and improve ithreads performance ! :)
That's a prerequisite for transaction support somehow ...
torvald
How so? And whats
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 02:22:58PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:18:57 -0400 Rocco Caputo wrote:
+--
| You bring up an interesting question in passing. What should POE's
| components be called? POE::Component, POE::Class, POE::Object?
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 11:22:05PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote:
First: Are you abandoning plain perl? Will POE become a preprocessor
that chews on both code and pod/markup segments to build the final
system? I'm not sure I like that idea much. I enjoy a clean
separation between doc and
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:41:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
here are my comments:
-detailed information about aggregates:
components not only provide methods, they can hold data as well.
so you might need several components of one type, and you might want
to share them
UML-bits before is higher. That's the point, concept
and vocabulary reuse. The chance that users will be attracted is just higher.
If you take a look at the front page's diagram again: The polygon class has an
Polygon() method and aggregates 1 to infinite Points, which the polygon
calls vertices
On fredag, augusti 9, 2002, at 01:42 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arthur's question towards transaction support would be the real, big
solution.
It would be really cool to support transactions, and if you have full
control
about the input that goes into components you can do rollback, make
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:47:27PM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote:
I agree, transactions are often overkill and can be heavy, designing in
support for transactions that can be enabled and added in the future
would be very cool.
We have all the time in the world :-)
Then go take that time
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:30:00AM -0400, Richard Soderberg wrote:
On Friday, August 9, 2002, at 07:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What I meant was something different. A directory in which components
can
publish their services can be helpful, like you said.
The interfaces I'm
before is higher. That's the point, concept
and vocabulary reuse. The chance that users will be attracted is just higher.
If you take a look at the front page's diagram again: The polygon class has an
Polygon() method and aggregates 1 to infinite Points, which the polygon
calls vertices
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:43:01AM -0400, Al Tobey wrote:
Dia (http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/) can draw UML, but can only
generate C++ and Java (using a separate tool). I've used it for
documentation purposes, but not much else. It's part of GNOME, it's
free, it's written in C.
Well,
From: Rocco Caputo
I keep looking at UML, but nothing on the web has made much of an
impression with me. Is there a good book about UML?
UML Distilled: www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/020165783X
POE users should not be required to know UML.
It its done well, consumers of UML diagrams
On Friday, August 9, 2002, at 07:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What I meant was something different. A directory in which components
can
publish their services can be helpful, like you said.
The interfaces I'm talking about are real roles that components claim
to be
able to play. So
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:09:36 -0500 Garrett Goebel wrote:
+--
| From: Rocco Caputo
| I keep looking at UML, but nothing on the web has made much of an
| impression with me. Is there a good book about UML?
|
| UML Distilled: www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/020165783X
|
Well, generating Perl should be possible then. I think the approach
of embedding the description (UML or Rocco's notation) in the Perl
code is better. There are tools that try to generate UML from code, but
this is hard, and probably impossible for Perl code. Additionally,
POE does want to
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 12:27:02PM -0400, Al Tobey wrote:
Note that I think creating a custom description language/format within
POE would likely be much more efficient than using UML. I don't
remember seeing any UML-type modules on CPAN. Although, the XML modules
are quite nice - I've used
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:25:17AM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:09:36 -0500 Garrett Goebel wrote:
+--
| From: Rocco Caputo
| I keep looking at UML, but nothing on the web has made much of an
| impression with me. Is there a good book about UML?
|
On fredag, augusti 9, 2002, at 03:33 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then go take that time and improve ithreads performance ! :)
That's a prerequisite for transaction support somehow ...
torvald
How so? And whats wrong with the performance?
Arthur
hi,
here are my comments:
-detailed information about aggregates:
components not only provide methods, they can hold data as well.
so you might need several components of one type, and you might want
to share them with other aggregated components. so the namespace that
is filled with
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 18:41, Rocco Caputo wrote:
Do you specifically need to know when STDOUT is closed, or is it more
important to know that the child is done sending information at all?
The later would be sufficient, even though it would be nice to have
finer grain control.
For example, I
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 00:33, Chris Fedde wrote:
I saw behavior like this with 0.18 on FreeBSD 4.5 and Solaris 2.8.
After 0.19 the sigchld consistently arrives after two error events
marking failed nonblocking read on stderr and stdout.
Unfortunately, I don't share the same experience. I
On 22 May 2002 17:49:15 -0400 Peter Chen wrote:
+--
| On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 00:33, Chris Fedde wrote:
| To my knowledge
| there is still no way to map the error events back to file handles.
|
| Let me make sure I understand this. Do you mean there is no way to know
|
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:44:18PM -0400, Peter Chen wrote:
Back in last December, there was a thread on how to handle EOF on the
stdout from POE::Wheel::Run. Was there any follow up to this?
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00767.html
I am seeing the same problem in POE 0.19.
Is there a way
On 21 May 2002 18:44:18 -0400 Peter Chen wrote:
+--
| Back in last December, there was a thread on how to handle EOF on the
| stdout from POE::Wheel::Run. Was there any follow up to this?
|
| http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00767.html
|
| I am seeing the same problem in POE
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 18:58, Chris Fedde wrote:
I have not had time to clean it up yet. But my test code now behaves
predictably: All the output arrives before sigchld. I can't tell
which file handles the errors are on. But all the data has been read
before the sigchld which was the big
On 08-Jul-2001 Artur Bergman wrote:
+Kernel hooks:
+
+ # Kernel hooks lets you set hooks at varius points in the kernel
+ $hookid = $kernel-hook_set($when, $session, $hook, $callback,
$event);
+ $kernel-hook_remeve($hookid);
^^ remove
+dispatch_state
On 04-Jul-2001 Rocco Caputo wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:54:42PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29-Jun-2001 Rocco Caputo wrote:
URI style isn't transparent. Ideally, a program shouldn't need to
know whether it's talking to a poe thingy or a stem thingy, so
everything up to
On 29-Jun-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to my mind namespaces entries shouldn't correspond to POE internals.
No, but routing between object-layers and components should be transparent.
its ok for a quick approach. anything better depends on a lot of things
and i don't think it can be
For those of you who aren't on IRC, here is a list of different schemes
for doing addressing in POE and beyond.
http://pied.nu/Perl/addresses.txt
Anyone have other ideas? Any preferences?
-Philip
34 matches
Mail list logo
