Have you seen the drawing code in HSSF? Maybe its similar/same?
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 03:02 +, Robert Paris wrote:
I'm working on the part of Word that stores pictures and I've run into a
problem. I'm able to grab the PIC structure (from the SPRM
sprmCPicLocation). However, once I've
Just to let you know, I've finally managed to fix this... properly. CVS
is down, so i'll probably check this in tomorrow. Added some extra tests
as well.
Regards
-
Avik
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 23:36 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also cant reconcile this behaviour with the fact that the code
with the following error. Ideas?? Can someone confirm this with latest
CVS HEAD?
(ant -Dtestcase=org.apache.poi.poifs.filesystem.TestEmptyDocument
single-test)
[junit] Testcase: testSingleEmptyDocument took 0.113 sec
[junit] Caused an ERROR
[junit] Cannot remove block[ 0 ]; out of
Ok, thanks. That makes sense. Do you have a bug he for this? I'll update the
code with that. In any event i think we should not run known failing tests by
default, it can hide other breakage. I've been thinking of a way to keep them
separately in cvs; for now i'll disable them.Quoting Rainer
Hi Robert,
Although I have not looked at the BSE record code myself, I have some
information from my own work on Escher diagrams.
A BSE record contains a fixed size header, and then may be followed by an
optional string (2 bytes per character). Could this string be the file name
you have
Ok, thanks. That makes sense. Do you have a bug he for this? I'll update the
code with that. In any event i think we should not run known failing tests by
default, it can hide other breakage. I've been thinking of a way to keep them
separately in cvs; for now i'll disable them.Quoting Rainer
Ok, thanks. That makes sense. Do you have a bug he for this? I'll update the
code with that. In any event i think we should not run known failing tests by
default, it can hide other breakage. I've been thinking of a way to keep them
separately in cvs; for now i'll disable them.Quoting Rainer
Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2005, 23:17 +0530 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok, thanks. That makes sense. Do you have a bug he for this? I'll update the
code with that. In any event i think we should not run known failing tests by
default, it can hide other breakage. I've been thinking of a way to
Thanks for the reply.
OH, if only it were so simple. I believe I found it, and as with all other
Word formats, the thing is a mess. You have to loop through and when you
find the right record (and check a thousand fWhateverBooleans and option
shorts), you then have to parse the complex data,
