Re: future of POI?

Andrew C. Oliver schrieb: > I support continuing to enforce the follow guidelines for out of > scratchpad: > > 1. round trip (Read/write test) > 2. large number of unit tests > 3. No duplication of org.poi.util.* > 4. Documentation for a reasonable person to get started/etc. > I second that. B

Re: future of POI?

> Assuming the apache board approves our TLP proposal, in a few months time, > we might be in a position to sponsor an existing open source ODF library > through the apache incubator, and then have them join POI. That's > something we could consider if a suitable project was found, but there's > n

Re: future of POI?

I support continuing to enforce the follow guidelines for out of scratchpad: 1. round trip (Read/write test) 2. large number of unit tests 3. No duplication of org.poi.util.* 4. Documentation for a reasonable person to get started/etc. These continue to be required for my non -1. This is just a

Re: [VOTE] Release 3.0 RC4 as 3.0 FINAL

+1...again On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 19:31 +0530, Avik Sengupta wrote: > +1 > > On Thursday 10 May 2007 3:29:31 pm Nick Burch wrote: > > Hi All > > > > Since no-one has raised any objections in the last week, I guess we all > > think we're ready to release 3.0 RC4 as 3.0 FINAL. > > > > Voting will cl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42448] New: - Can't parse SUMPRODUCT(A!C7:A!C67, B8:B68) / B69

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu