gaar,
That was a smart move. It's good that your particular life
circumstances allowed you to do that.
On Nov 10, 11:34 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually thought it was pretty good for playing Games...
>
> It was enough that I could put a significant portion of it away every
> yea
Just a couple of observations, and I will try and be short. I liked what
WNCS wrote in one of her posts above, (If I got the gender wrong I
apologize).
I have been guilty of slinging some insults, inclusive of this thread. It
is hard not to sling insults in this group, when you are having them t
I actually thought it was pretty good for playing Games...
It was enough that I could put a significant portion of it away every
year.
Which eventually became the Assets I used to start Trading.
On Nov 10, 9:14 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gaar,
>
> That's not too bad for playing
gaar,
That's not too bad for playing games. Good for you.
On Nov 10, 11:06 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In excess of $50k, but not more than $75k...
>
> Without Bonuses.
>
> Is that good enough for you?
>
> On Nov 10, 8:25 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Gaar,
>
> > T
Friends who I worked with at Nintendo make in excess of $100k...
Sometimes I think I should have never left, but I would have never
been able to "make" Games if I hadn't.
On Nov 10, 9:06 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In excess of $50k, but not more than $75k...
>
> Without Bonuses.
>
>
In excess of $50k, but not more than $75k...
Without Bonuses.
Is that good enough for you?
On Nov 10, 8:25 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaar,
>
> That little, huh? What? You got like free T-shirts and games from
> manufacturer's and a cheesy little plaque that said "Game Master"
Gaar,
That little, huh? What? You got like free T-shirts and games from
manufacturer's and a cheesy little plaque that said "Game Master"?
On Nov 10, 9:37 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not as much as I make Trading Stocks.
>
> And hence the reason I quit working.
>
> On Nov 10, 7:33 am,
Gaar,
Said I was not interested enough to DO it, not that I was not
interested enough to discuss it. I'm interested in the Presidential
election, but have no interest in running for the office. Dh.
On Nov 10, 3:29 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not the one claiming to not be inter
Gaar,
Just curious. Is it on the scale of a civil engineer, a doctor an auto
mechanic, a pilot? You don't have to be specific, I can respect a
person's privacy.You were just bragging about it so, you brought it
into the conversation. I'm just saying...
On Nov 10, 3:31 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTE
So you say...
You understand a Simulator is just like the Real Thing, right?
Except you don't die when you make a mistake in a Simulator.
On Nov 10, 3:51 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bet you would lose -- your negative, depressive tact
> notwithstanding.
>
> On Nov 9, 5:00 pm, Ga
Not as much as I make Trading Stocks.
And hence the reason I quit working.
On Nov 10, 7:33 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaar,
>
> Just curious. Is it on the scale of a civil engineer, a doctor an auto
> mechanic, a pilot? You don't have to be specific, I can respect a
> person's p
By this standard so is the GOP... If I use as a reference far Right
groups...But in the world of the Center, Democrats ARE the LW...
On Nov 9, 6:54 am, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats dumb is that you people think that the Dems are a left wing
> organization, when they are
A bet you would lose -- your negative, depressive tact
notwithstanding.
On Nov 9, 5:00 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 9:29 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No, and neither can you.
>
> Actually, I have landed one on a Carrier, in a Computer Simulator...
>
> I bet you
This coming from someone who doesn't seem to do anything but insult.
Imagine that.
On Nov 9, 11:24 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree entirely! The insults are, aside from waste, a detriment to
> the dynamic of this forum.
>
> Perhaps, now that the election chaos has subsided, w
What do you care?
Enough to put some in the Market...
On Nov 9, 9:35 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gaar,
>
> So what's being a "Game Master" pay?
>
> On Nov 9, 6:44 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 9, 4:26 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Wow! You
I'm not the one claiming to not be interested, as I post away...
On Nov 9, 8:44 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gaar,
>
> Simply more of your moronic distraction.
>
> On Nov 9, 5:42 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I agree entirely! The insults are, aside from waste, a detriment to
the dynamic of this forum.
Perhaps, now that the election chaos has subsided, we can conduct
ourselves in a more civil manner.
On Nov 9, 8:26 pm, wncs woke up in a blue state
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would agree that in
gaar,
So what's being a "Game Master" pay?
On Nov 9, 6:44 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 4:26 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wow! You actually landed one on a carrier in a computer simulator? You
> > must have been hell on wheels with Pac Man! Wow! Really?
>
> Yep
back to bush being a monkey... ooo ooo ooo ah AH!
On Nov 9, 11:44 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gaar,
>
> Simply more of your moronic distraction.
>
> On Nov 9, 5:42 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > No idea, nev
gaar,
Simply more of your moronic distraction.
On Nov 9, 5:42 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No idea, never had enough interest to try. Who gives a fuck?
>
> Probably those interested enough to read and respond...
>
> Which, in
Intregity? As with beauty, it's in the eye of the beholder.
Eh?
On Nov 9, 8:26 pm, wncs woke up in a blue state
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would agree that in the past week, there are far too many insults on
> this board, whether a point is being made in the process or not. I was
> hoping t
I would agree that in the past week, there are far too many insults on
this board, whether a point is being made in the process or not. I was
hoping that things might settle down. Perhaps we could ALL use fewer
insults in our discourse. It is unfair to insult others and not expect
them to respond,
Pretty sure I explained why they are an ignorant ass.
On Nov 9, 6:15 pm, wncs woke up in a blue state
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "against the person"
>
> Would calling someone an "ignorant ass" repeatedly count as an
> argument against that person?
>
> On Nov 9, 8:35 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Yep, and if that is all I said, then it would be an insult only post.
On Nov 9, 6:15 pm, wncs woke up in a blue state
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "against the person"
>
> Would calling someone an "ignorant ass" repeatedly count as an
> argument against that person?
>
> On Nov 9, 8:35 pm, Gaar <
No post of mine was simply JUST an insult, if there were point them
out.
On Nov 9, 5:51 pm, wncs woke up in a blue state
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might want to remember that I also didn't step in as a "moderator"
> when you hurled insults at me non-stop last week.
>
> On Nov 9, 7:23 pm,
Insults are allowed, posts that only insult are not.
On Nov 9, 5:50 pm, wncs woke up in a blue state
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaar,
> I sent a message to you stating that I would be out of town until
> Sunday night. I am just getting home and taking a quick peek at the
> board while unloadin
"against the person"
Would calling someone an "ignorant ass" repeatedly count as an
argument against that person?
On Nov 9, 8:35�pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 5:31�pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Empirical evidence. Hmmm!
>
> Yes, the type we can both look at and t
You might want to remember that I also didn't step in as a "moderator"
when you hurled insults at me non-stop last week.
On Nov 9, 7:23�pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yet more Ad Hominems, with no point being made. �At some point, one
> would think wncs would step up and do what a Moderato
Gaar,
I sent a message to you stating that I would be out of town until
Sunday night. I am just getting home and taking a quick peek at the
board while unloading the vehicle. How in the world would you expect
me to address something when I'm not here? And if you have a problem
with my abilities or
On Nov 9, 5:31 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Empirical evidence. Hmmm!
Yes, the type we can both look at and then supposedly discuss in an
Adult manner...
Like your posts on this Forum.
Everyone can see the things you say, and understand that you are
making your argument "against th
And still nothing but Ad Hominem attacks...
Does it ever end with these Loony Liberals?
One would think that taking over and destroying our Country would be
enough for them...
But no, they have to continue their assault of nothing but Hate,
devoid of anything productive to help our Nation and u
Empirical evidence. Hmmm!
On Nov 9, 7:19 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you say...
>
> I believe it is a tiny mind that can draw such conclussion about
> People on a discussion Board.
>
> Please, carry on.
>
> You have proven your inability to make a cogent argument, and you are
> suppl
This is highly apparent and unfortunately adversely affecting the
political paradigm of this forum. I'm glad that someone else other
than myself has recognized it.
On Nov 9, 6:17 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He has a truly severe problem with reading comprehension.
>
> On 11/9/08
So you say...
I believe it is a tiny mind that can draw such conclussion about
People on a discussion Board.
Please, carry on.
You have proven your inability to make a cogent argument, and you are
supplying endless empirical evidence to support my assertion of such.
On Nov 9, 5:16 pm, WarpTen
Just as you do it seems...
But I back mine with the empirical evidence that supports it, and am
willing to discuss it.
You and yours, not so much.
So there should be no question when I call you a Loony Liberal, ok?
I don't want to insult True Liberals, after all.
On Nov 9, 5:15 pm, WarpTen <
It doesn't take much more than to read your posts to know nearly
everything about you gaar.
On Nov 9, 4:26 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And again you talk like you know me...
>
> You haven't a Clue.
>
> That much is obvious.
>
> On Nov 9, 2:17 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yet more Ad Hominems with nothing of substance...
Should I be surprised?
Hardly.
On Nov 9, 5:14 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is really hard to see when living in a bubble. Thanks for shedding
> more light for gaar to possibly see, MK
>
> On Nov 9, 4:17 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMA
Nice cliche gaar! You do have your opinion don't you?
On Nov 9, 4:25 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, so you say...
>
> Opinions are like Assholes, everyone has one.
>
> On Nov 9, 2:17 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My opinion based on where I have been and what I
I was only asking...
Seems there are many People who like to criticize things they have
never done.
And it seems you are another one of those here.
Imagine that.
On Nov 9, 5:12 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gaar, you have your head stuck so far up your own ass you can't see
> dayli
It is really hard to see when living in a bubble. Thanks for shedding
more light for gaar to possibly see, MK
On Nov 9, 4:17 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My opinion based on where I have been and what I have done is worth way more
> than your Wiki and CIA fact sources.
>
> Get ou
Did you make any cogent arguments there that needs to be responded to?
Nope, none. Just more Ad hominem attacks...
Imagine that.
As for your problems with the terminology I use, try this...
http://dictionary.reference.com/
Hope that helps.
On Nov 9, 5:05 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
gaar, you have your head stuck so far up your own ass you can't see
daylight. What the hell are you trying to purport here?
You must think you are the greatest thing on the planet because you
can use a simulator which is actually in all actuality a "stimulator"
to your egoism.
On Nov 9, 4:13
Wow gaar, your vocabulary is really impressive. Let's have a look,
empirical evidence, ad hominem, refute, a lot of shit and tiny little
loony. That is really indicative of your intelligence level gaar. How
do you expect people to respect your views when you misuse terminology
so recklessly? Did
On Nov 9, 4:26 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow! You actually landed one on a carrier in a computer simulator? You
> must have been hell on wheels with Pac Man! Wow! Really?
Yep.
There was a reason EA started a new position for me...
They named it "Game Master".
>
> You must be o
Thanks MK
The density is unfathomable.
On Nov 9, 4:03 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> READING COMPREHENSION take a class or three.
>
> On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > And which of those did he address, specifically?
>
> > On Nov 9, 10:23 am,
Wow! You actually landed one on a carrier in a computer simulator? You
must have been hell on wheels with Pac Man! Wow! Really?
You must be one of those Genius types!
LOL
Your just a piss ant in the global arena gaar.
On Nov 9, 4:00 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 9:29 am, R
Ad Hominem is making your argument to or about the person instead of
the point they have made.
Both of your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding.
No surprise you don't get it, since you are unable to make a cogent
argument, it is about all you have it seems.
On Nov 9, 4:11 pm, WarpTen <[EMA
Yet more Ad Hominems, with no point being made. At some point, one
would think wncs would step up and do what a Moderator is supposed to
do, but I won't hold my breath.
On Nov 9, 4:17 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He has a truly severe problem with reading comprehension.
>
> On
He has a truly severe problem with reading comprehension.
On 11/9/08, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thank You Mr. Kahle!
> It seems that gaar hasn't the capacity to understand the essence of
> ad hominem and so needlessly continues to put out more "Gaarbage" in
> an attempt to appear
Thank You Mr. Kahle!
It seems that gaar hasn't the capacity to understand the essence of
ad hominem and so needlessly continues to put out more "Gaarbage" in
an attempt to appear intelligible, unfortunately the delivery is far
from perspicuous. The ambiguity is so prevalent within gaar's commen
On Nov 9, 3:38 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No idea, never had enough interest to try. Who gives a fuck?
Probably those interested enough to read and respond...
Which, interestingly enough, seems to include you, despite your
rhetoric.
--~--~-~--~~~---
Gaar,
does that mean you don't have a pilots license and are not being
posted on an aircraft carrier?
No idea, never had enough interest to try. Who gives a fuck?
On Nov 9, 5:10 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes holly, we understand that you couldn't do the Simulator either...
>
> No su
Yes holly, we understand that you couldn't do the Simulator either...
No surprise there.
On Nov 9, 3:06 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaar,
>
> Got your pilot's license yet? Take a letter from Nintendo or
> whomeverthefuck documenting all your "flight experience" up to the FAA
> an
Shit, H,
they barely have a web site!!
On 11/9/08, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Gaar,
>
> Got your pilot's license yet? Take a letter from Nintendo or
> whomeverthefuck documenting all your "flight experience" up to the FAA
> and see if they give you one. Better yet, go to the
Gaar,
Got your pilot's license yet? Take a letter from Nintendo or
whomeverthefuck documenting all your "flight experience" up to the FAA
and see if they give you one. Better yet, go to the Navy and see if
they will post you to carrier flying F-18's. Good luck.
San Marino got an air force? LOL!
On Nov 9, 3:02 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, and like everything else in the world some are better than others.
And no doubt you have "tried" many, and are speaking from
experience...
I bow to your superior knowledge on that Subject.
--~--~-~--~~---
Yes, and like everything else in the world some are better than others.
I am sure there is a cream or possibly a surgery available for yours.
On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Again, so you say...
>
> Opinions are like Assholes, everyone has one.
>
>
> On Nov 9, 2:17 pm, "Mar
And again you talk like you know me...
You haven't a Clue.
That much is obvious.
On Nov 9, 2:17 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My opinion based on where I have been and what I have done is worth way more
> than your Wiki and CIA fact sources.
>
> Get out, Travel, see some of the
Again, so you say...
Opinions are like Assholes, everyone has one.
On Nov 9, 2:17 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My opinion based on where I have been and what I have done is worth way more
> than your Wiki and CIA fact sources.
>
> Get out, Travel, see some of the world. Do not
My opinion based on where I have been and what I have done is worth way more
than your Wiki and CIA fact sources.
Get out, Travel, see some of the world. Do not stay in hotels, learn a
little of each language you come accross and LEARN SOMETHING.
your standard one sided sources have truly fucked
You understand that is how they TEACH Real Pilots to do it, right?
On Nov 9, 2:12 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ever done a Simulator, successfully?
>
> On Nov 9, 2:02 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > great fear factor there. no simulator 400 ft helo jump
Ever done a Simulator, successfully?
On Nov 9, 2:02 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> great fear factor there. no simulator 400 ft helo jump. try it
>
> On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 9, 9:29 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > No, a
On Nov 9, 2:03 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> READING COMPREHENSION take a class or three.
Interesting...
He can't cite even one.
And right into the Ad Hominems.
Anyone surprised?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "P
Sure he could...
Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding.
On Nov 9, 10:21 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you are right ,,,bush can't.
>
> On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Can you land a Jet on an Aircraft Carrier?
>
> > I don't believe an Idiot c
Again, so you say...
You say a lot of shit, and rarely offer anything but your OPINION as
any type of proof.
And when offered empirical evidence to refute your Loony assertions
you dismiss them outright and go into your Ad Hominem attacks.
You have obviously never been wrong, in your tiny littl
READING COMPREHENSION take a class or three.
On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> And which of those did he address, specifically?
>
>
> On Nov 9, 10:23 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no, not on ad hominem attack included he was indeed talking about yo
great fear factor there. no simulator 400 ft helo jump. try it
On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 9, 9:29 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, and neither can you.
>
>
> Actually, I have landed one on a Carrier, in a Computer Simulator...
>
> I bet you c
And which of those did he address, specifically?
On Nov 9, 10:23 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, not on ad hominem attack included he was indeed talking about your
> positions and ideology.
>
> On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Wow, that was some ret
On Nov 9, 9:29 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, and neither can you.
Actually, I have landed one on a Carrier, in a Computer Simulator...
I bet you can't even do that successfully.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at G
you'll have to wait until Jan. 20th QUAKKO.
On 11/9/08, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> sorry warppy, but what goes around, comes around. you retards on the
> left spent 8 yrs attacking the President, well now it is our turn.
> at least we have some truth behind our attacks. such as
> you
no, not on ad hominem attack included he was indeed talking about your
positions and ideology.
On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Wow, that was some retorte... Not.
>
> Did you make any point in that diatribe?
>
> Nope, nothing but Ad Hominem attacks...
>
> Imagine that.
>
>
> On N
you are right ,,,bush can't.
On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Can you land a Jet on an Aircraft Carrier?
>
> I don't believe an Idiot could.
>
>
> On Nov 9, 4:40 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Despite the fact that President Bush has a B.S.
> > Degree from Yale, and an
and so it is.
On 11/9/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> So you say...
>
>
> On Nov 8, 9:19 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gaar,
> >
> > He was obviously referring to the 2000 and 2004 elections, only an
> > idiot would not have realized that.
> >
> > On Nov 8, 10:55 pm, Gaar
OK then, I'll await the rendering of the verdict
On Nov 9, 9:10 am, KeithInTampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 7:40 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I earned a Master's Degree from Stevens Institute of Technology
> (studying nights and weekends), while working full-time and t
No, and neither can you.
I never called Bush an Idiot.
On Nov 9, 8:44 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you land a Jet on an Aircraft Carrier?
>
> I don't believe an Idiot could.
>
> On Nov 9, 4:40 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Despite the fact that President Bush has a B.
Name one point you made in any of that...
I'll wait here.
Or do you not understand what an Ad Hominem attack is?
On Nov 9, 6:51 am, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did make a point and you just proved my point. lol
>
> Not ad hominem at all, but if you insist I'll make exception
> consi
I did make a point and you just proved my point. lol
Not ad hominem at all, but if you insist I'll make exception
considering the source.
On Nov 9, 8:42 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, that was some retorte... Not.
>
> Did you make any point in that diatribe?
>
> Nope, nothing but Ad
sorry warppy, but what goes around, comes around. you retards on the
left spent 8 yrs attacking the President, well now it is our turn.
at least we have some truth behind our attacks. such as
your boy is the most inexperience numbnuts elected
a marxist socialist
questionable citizenship
surrend
On Nov 9, 6:40 am, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope gaar and the
> others can get over it and stop wasting time on fabricated falsehoods
> and nauseating innuendo.
This coming from those that have gone on about Bush for nearly 8 years
now...
Imagine that, he is a Hypocrite.
--~--~-
Wow, that was some retorte... Not.
Did you make any point in that diatribe?
Nope, nothing but Ad Hominem attacks...
Imagine that.
On Nov 9, 6:40 am, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hollywood;
> This is the problem with gaar and others in here, wasting time with
> bullshit nonsense equiv
Bravo!!
On Nov 9, 6:40 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Despite the fact that President Bush has a B.S.
> Degree from Yale, and an MBA from Harvard
> =
> With all of the backing that he's had in life, it's just not that
> impressive.
>
> I e
Hollywood;
This is the problem with gaar and others in here, wasting time with
bullshit nonsense equivalent to High School antics. The Only value in
it is the Humorous aspect of it. Its such a joke to see how they
squirm around in the muck trying to come up with something plausible
through abstra
On Nov 9, 7:40 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I earned a Master's Degree from Stevens Institute of Technology
(studying nights and weekends), while working full-time and taking
care of my family.
I am not a moonbat.
=
Keith Responds:
Political Amazon got her MBA from Dr. Bolo's Sch
Can you land a Jet on an Aircraft Carrier?
I don't believe an Idiot could.
On Nov 9, 4:40 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Despite the fact that President Bush has a B.S.
> Degree from Yale, and an MBA from Harvard
> =
> With all of the ba
oo warped called me a racist. oo
such a typical response from the mentally challenged retards. all I
did was ask a simple question, eh? since the retards on the left seem
to feel presidents are chimps, does that apply to the newest one?
On Nov 9, 7:40 am, Running <[EMAIL PROTECT
Despite the fact that President Bush has a B.S.
Degree from Yale, and an MBA from Harvard
=
With all of the backing that he's had in life, it's just not that
impressive.
I earned a Master's Degree from Stevens Institute of Technology
(studying night
Whats dumb is that you people think that the Dems are a left wing
organization, when they are to the far right. All these arguments when
the Dems and the GOP are two factions within the one party of
Corporate America. Anyone who can not see this is blind, stupid, in
denial or all three-which is mo
So you say...
On Nov 8, 9:19 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaar,
>
> He was obviously referring to the 2000 and 2004 elections, only an
> idiot would not have realized that.
>
> On Nov 8, 10:55 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > This coming from a guy that thinks Bush was
Gaar,
He was obviously referring to the 2000 and 2004 elections, only an
idiot would not have realized that.
On Nov 8, 10:55 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This coming from a guy that thinks Bush was running for a 3rd Term...
>
> On Nov 8, 6:32 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
This coming from a guy that thinks Bush was running for a 3rd Term...
On Nov 8, 6:32 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are clearly the Racist Mark!
>
> You are truly MarkSchism.
>
> On Nov 8, 10:04 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > will they do the same to the new chimp?-
You are clearly the Racist Mark!
You are truly MarkSchism.
On Nov 8, 10:04 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> will they do the same to the new chimp?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see h
On Nov 8, 6:23 pm, WarpTen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Idiots voted for Bush Chaney gaar!!!
Bush and Cheney weren't on the Ballot.
And you wonder why I call you ignorant...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For op
Idiots voted for Bush Chaney gaar!!!
Get it right gaar!!!
Crawl out of your shell gaar!!
Bush and his cronies buried us, our children, our grandchildren and
possibly our great grandchildren, all in deep debt gaar.
Why are you so adamant about it gaar?
Even McCain AND Bush committed to doing e
On Nov 8, 11:52 am, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apparently so. idiots voted in droves.
Yes they did, and Obama was Elected because of it...
For the first time in History, it seems Citizens under 30 decided this
Election.
And now we have proof that our Education System has bve
On Nov 8, 11:25 am, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still don't get it. Despite the fact that President Bush has a B.S.
> Degree from Yale, and an MBA from Harvard, Moonbats consider our current
> President an idiot.
And yet they seem to also claim he is Genius...
Able to convi
Understood? FUCK His daddy trained and funded them!
On 11/8/08, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The Left HAS TO ASSUME their sucessful opponents are dumb, if they do
> not, their assumption of "IQ uber alles" or the "IQ measures
> character" is proven false... Ther
The Left HAS TO ASSUME their sucessful opponents are dumb, if they do
not, their assumption of "IQ uber alles" or the "IQ measures
character" is proven false... There are many types of smarts, and
Bush UNDERSTOOD the character of Radical Islamic instinctively while
the "irrational "Rational" Lef
apparently so. idiots voted in droves.
On 11/8/08, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Apparently an idiot can give the Dems a thumpin 2 elections in a
> row. What that make the dems? Less than an idiot??
>
> On Nov 8, 12:24 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seem
Apparently an idiot can give the Dems a thumpin 2 elections in a
row. What that make the dems? Less than an idiot??
On Nov 8, 12:24 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems??? My dog is more intelligent, more honest and more consistent
> in his positions than boy George.
>
>
On Nov 8, 1:24 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
Seems??? My dog is more intelligent, more honest and more consistent in his
positions than boy George.
On Nov 8, 11:45 am, Running wrote:
Unlikely, as Obama seems to be more intelligent than Bush.
==
I still don't get it. Despite the fact
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
