Re: [Pool] IPv6 monitoring enabled in beta pool

2011-06-07 Thread Martin v. Löwis
My plan is to just enable records for 2.pool.ntp.org (and 2.fedora.pool.ntp.org etc) and see how that goes. Depending on the outcome, we can make a ipv6.pool.ntp.org IPv6-enabled or IPv6-only pool. For the use case I envision (production-style support for v6-only hosts), it doesn't

Re: [Pool] IPv6 DNS in beta pool

2011-06-07 Thread Glendon Solsberry
Any idea why 2.us.pool.ntp.org is resolving records, but [13].us.pool.ntp.org is not (nor, for that matter, almost any other set of hosts I try)? On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:14:51PM -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: Hi everyone, If you add 2.beta.grundclock.com to your ntpd.conf and you

Re: [Pool] IPv6 DNS in beta pool

2011-06-07 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Jun 7, 2011, at 1:38, Tim Bray wrote: On 07/06/11 04:43, Anssi Johansson wrote: My only concern at this time is that it's going to take about 18 hours to get my IPv6 NTP servers' score from -9.8 to the acceptable score of 10. There's still about 20.5 hours to go until June 8th 00:00

Re: [Pool] IPv6 monitoring enabled in beta pool - is it just me?

2011-06-07 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jun 7, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Rob Janssen wrote: You almost certainly don't want to be implementing stateful rules for NTP traffic; you'll fill up the state table with lots of entries for no benefit, as UDP isn't stateful. Just pass UDP 123 and ephemeral high ports in both directions.