Re: [Pool] Getting close to 1000 IPv6 servers

2013-03-21 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 21:02, Hal Murray wrote: mar...@v.loewis.de (mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de) said: OTTH, there is also a less-real chance that someone is negatively affected by the status quo - if they have an IPv6-only node, they would only get one time server configured, even

Re: [Pool] Encouraging IPv6 use

2013-03-21 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 at 15:32, Kurt Roeckx wrote: So maybe you want to have 1 hostname for the case of using the pool, and several for the case of not using the pool. And in Debian we ship more than 1 (s)ntp client, none is currently installed by default, but we might do that at

Re: [Pool] Getting close to 1000 IPv6 servers

2013-03-21 Thread Hal Murray
Can anybody test the pool command in a IPv6 only environment? For what it's worth: I'm using it on some of my boxes at home; though they have IPv4, too. It's working fine as far as I can tell except for the quirk that you get twice as many active servers when you are dual stacked compared to