On Mar 21, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:
Can anybody test the pool command in a IPv6 only environment?
For what it's worth: I'm using it on some of my boxes at home; though they
have IPv4, too. It's working fine as far as I can tell except for the quirk
that
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 21:02, Hal Murray wrote:
mar...@v.loewis.de (mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de) said:
OTTH, there is also a less-real chance that someone is negatively affected
by the status quo - if they have an IPv6-only node, they would only get one
time server configured, even
Can anybody test the pool command in a IPv6 only environment?
For what it's worth: I'm using it on some of my boxes at home; though they
have IPv4, too. It's working fine as far as I can tell except for the quirk
that you get twice as many active servers when you are dual stacked compared
to
On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:48 PM, Markku Miettinen su...@surfa.name wrote:
This is absolutely the way that a client SHOULD NOT work and this is what
many OS and application developers with IETF have been trying to shoot down
for years. It is not how IPv6 works as stated one of latter e-mails.
Am 12.03.13 22:48, schrieb Markku Miettinen:
This is absolutely the way that a client SHOULD NOT work and this is
what many OS and application developers with IETF have been trying to
shoot down for years. It is not how IPv6 works as stated one of latter
e-mails.
No no no. It works exactly as
Do you have any stats about what kind of IPv6 traffic the pool sees?
Looking at my one v6 enabled NTP server I see only a tiny amount of
v6 traffic.
I'm seeing pretty close to none (I've been snooping for over ten
minutes and have seen exactly two incoming and two outgoing packets).
But I
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 11:00, Brian Rak wrote:
Do you have any stats about what kind of IPv6 traffic the pool sees?
I started making a program to track the NTP traffic last fall, but I didn't get
too far.
I'd guess 1/50 to 1/200th of the IPv4 traffic.
Looking at my one v6 enabled NTP
:* pool@lists.ntp.org
*Subject:* Re: [Pool] Getting close to 1000 IPv6 servers
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 11:00, Brian Rak wrote:
Do you have any stats about what kind of IPv6 traffic the pool sees?
I started making a program to track the NTP traffic last fall, but I
didn't get too far
it is..
--
Markku Miettinen
From: James Hartig
Sent: March 12, 2013 8:14 PM
To: su...@surfa.name
CC: Ask Bjørn Hansen; pool@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: [Pool] Getting close to 1000 IPv6 servers
I'm seeing like 2x traffic in Canada at my server compared to IPv4. Even when
the net speed is roughly half
I'd have to agree as well. Enabling IPv6 on all the pool hostnames is
probably a safe thing to do at this point.
On 3/12/2013 3:36 PM, Richard Braun wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:05:29PM +, su...@surfa.name wrote:
I guess we would indeed see notable increase in traffic if we enabled
Hi Ask,
Why would service be worse? Doesn't ntpd ask for A and records? If
so, it'd still get the same number of IPv4 records, plus the IPv6?
-Darryl
(I've just added 3x IPv6 servers to the pool in AU).
On 13/03/2013 7:41 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:59, Brian
On Mar 12, 2013, at 16:48, Darryl Ross dar...@afoyi.com wrote:
Why would service be worse? Doesn't ntpd ask for A and records? If so,
it'd still get the same number of IPv4 records, plus the IPv6?
Most clients will only use the records if available.
You can setup multiple servers, but only one IP is fetched from a DNS
server at a time. That's a fact of the DNS system. If IPv6 is running
properly, records are priorised. That means that every client able to
use IPv6 will use IPv6.
Am 13.03.2013 01:56 schrieb Darryl Ross dar...@afoyi.com:
On 2013-03-13T02:35:06+0100, oliver domke m...@piflix.de wrote:
You can setup multiple servers, but only one IP is fetched from a DNS
server at a time. That's a fact of the DNS system. If IPv6 is running
properly, records are priorised. That means that every client able to
use IPv6 will
That's not true, a DNS answer can certainly contain multiple A and
records.
A single answer? It can, yes, but I think the only way to get both
types in the answer section (as opposed to other sections, such as the
additional section) is for the query to be for type ANY. Most software
Am 12.03.13 14:11, schrieb Ask Bjørn Hansen:
On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:59, Brian Rak b...@constant.com wrote:
I'd have to agree as well. Enabling IPv6 on all the pool hostnames
is probably a safe thing to do at this point.
In most countries the service will be much worse; there are just not
mar...@v.loewis.de said:
OTTH, there is also a less-real chance that someone is negatively affected
by the status quo - if they have an IPv6-only node, they would only get one
time server configured, even though three different servers would be readily
available.
That should get fixed when
, there are similar
things happening in the IPv4 all the time and there is no special buzz about it
anywhere.
--
Markku Miettinen
From: Ask Bjørn Hansen
Sent: March 13, 2013 1:12 AM
To: Darryl Ross
CC: pool@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: [Pool] Getting close to 1000 IPv6 servers
On Mar 12, 2013
18 matches
Mail list logo
