[poppler] Splash SPOT_NCOMPS != 4 ?

2020-08-27 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Hi, out of curiosity and not important, does anybody know in which case Splashs SPOT_NCOMPS would not be 4? Preprocessor directives in splash/SplashTypes.h suggest that SPOT_NCOMPS is intended to be set at compile time, and 4 is just the default value: #ifndef SPOT_NCOMPS #define

Re: [poppler] What's your feeling in adding a _clang_format file to the repo

2020-06-04 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 04.06.2020 22:53 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: This way we would have a common style in the files, which we kind of but not really have. Also, i'd suggest that common standard to not be the braindead mix of spaces + tabs that we inherited from xpdf and make it. Attached my suggestion. Problem

Re: [poppler] PDF form

2019-07-05 Thread Tobias Deiminger
of the PDF standard. Contact your government and tell them they should fix their PDF files to be standards compliant. Cheers, Albert On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 7:03 AM Tobias Deiminger wrote: > Hi Valerio, > > Am 04.07.2019 12:05 schrieb Valerio Messina: > > I cannot find a

Re: [poppler] PDF form

2019-07-04 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Hi Valerio, Am 04.07.2019 12:05 schrieb Valerio Messina: I cannot find a Linux application to fill PDF forms. On Linux, last Acrobat is 9 and it can't too. Seems Evince and Okular cannot too. Does poppler support them, and someone can suggest and application poppler based that can fill forms?

Re: [poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec (answer from FSFE)

2019-03-10 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 10.03.2019 13:15 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: El diumenge, 10 de març de 2019, a les 12:59:15 CET, Germán Poo-Caamaño va escriure: On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 12:15 +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote: I think the right question is: How many (and who are) developers who might need access to the draft

[poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec (answer from FSFE)

2019-03-05 Thread Tobias Deiminger
...@posteo.de CC: aa...@kde.org Dear Tobias, Some weeks ago you've asked us for help with the latest PDF specification. 21/12/2018 09:57 - FSFE wrote: 12/12/2018 19:54 - Tobias Deiminger wrote: > Poppler developers need access to the PDF specification, > which used to be available free of

Re: [poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec

2018-11-29 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 29.11.2018 19:20 schrieb Tobias Deiminger: Am 29.11.2018 17:17 schrieb Leonard Rosenthol: The exception is citing - e.g. if you want to copy paragraphs word by word into source code or issue comments, you need a copy of the standard. You can't do that with an ISO document. ISO

Re: [poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec

2018-11-29 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 29.11.2018 17:17 schrieb Leonard Rosenthol: The exception is citing - e.g. if you want to copy paragraphs word by word into source code or issue comments, you need a copy of the standard. You can't do that with an ISO document. ISO does not permit copying of their material. You

Re: [poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec

2018-11-29 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 23.11.2018 03:29 schrieb Germán Poo-Caamaño: However, I think we should try to get at least someone in the committee. Tobias at least got an answer from DIN. I requested to participate to INN (the equivalent in my home country), and I have not received any answer in like 2 weeks :-/ Shall

Re: [poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec

2018-11-29 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 28.11.2018 23:18 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: a) "I won't do any poppler patches during the next 6 months and won't need the copy during that time. You can give the copy to someone else during these 6 months." Sorry for being annoying here, but what happens after those 6 months? can he

Re: [poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec

2018-11-23 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 23.11.2018 00:13 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: El dijous, 22 de novembre de 2018, a les 21:15:10 CET, Tobias Deiminger va escriure: Hi, Am 07.11.2018 22:35 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > Asking is free :) here comes a summary from an email conversion I had with DIN about licensing. They of

Re: [poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec

2018-11-22 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Hi, Am 07.11.2018 22:35 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: Asking is free :) here comes a summary from an email conversion I had with DIN about licensing. They offer two models to lower the price when multiple copies are needed: 1. Usage by 50% license fee - pay 50% of the original price per

Re: [poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec

2018-11-07 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Hi, Am 07.11.2018 07:03 schrieb Adam Reichold: Hello, Am 06.11.18 um 23:40 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: As said by Tobias on a merge request, at some point we'll probably start seeing bugs because of features used in PDF 2.0 that we don't support. TBH i've no idea if Adobe products support

Re: [poppler] FreeText font/border color in DA - ISO32k vs Adobe Reader vs poppler

2018-08-24 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am Freitag, 24. August 2018, 17:05:34 CEST schrieb Leonard Rosenthol: > That helped - thanks! > > It appears that even though we are parsing the DA for the text colors (and > storing them in a variable that tracks the GState of the DA) - we don't > actually use those text colors when we

[poppler] FreeText font/border color in DA - ISO32k vs Adobe Reader vs poppler

2018-08-23 Thread Tobias Deiminger
I'm posting here, esp. in the hope Leonard Rosenthol is reading. Adobe Reader behaves differently than I had expected. Want to figure out what's going on, because of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/issues/50. Questions is, how shall one adjust font color and border color of

Re: [poppler] inline notes? (poppler and pdf-tools/Emacs)

2018-08-20 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 20.08.2018 13:49 schrieb popp...@jpgeorget.net: Hi, I'm not a developper but I would like to know if poppler gives the ability to add inline notes in a PDF file. I use pdf-tools with emacs. It is based on poppler and it gives only the ability to add notes with an icon. The developper of

Re: [poppler] PDF compliance, regarding Annot /Rect

2018-03-25 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Leonard, there was a very interesting conversation between you and Fabio, see https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/2012-April/008948.html. Fabio wonders why acroread does not clip Annot Line [0 0 200 200] to Anot Rect [0 0 100 100]. You said: > Acrobat & Adobe Reader must certainly

Re: [poppler] PDF compliance, regarding Annot /Rect

2018-03-21 Thread Tobias Deiminger
(actively announced?) to downstream projects, because it's very likely some of them have adapted to the buggy poppler behavior and would have to change accordingly. I'll cut the patches out of my unrelated patch series therefore. Cheers Tobias On 3/20/18, 6:22 PM, "poppler on behalf of T

[poppler] PDF compliance, regarding Annot /Rect

2018-03-20 Thread Tobias Deiminger
I've stumbled upon the following issue several times, and it affects a patch series I'm currently doing. Please let me ask about it here. Suppose we've got an annotation object like << /Type /Annot /Rect [0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00] % ... other required stuff, omitted for readability ... % %

Re: [poppler] Patch in progress - looking for annotation related unit test data

2018-02-23 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Am 21.02.2018 03:15 schrieb Patrick Golden: Hi Tobias, Author of the email you cited, here. Also note that there is an open bug on the tracker to add individual annotation rendering to the glib Thanks for the hint Patrick. I added my story there

Re: [poppler] Patch in progress - looking for annotation related unit test data

2018-02-16 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Hi Leonard! Are you talking about rendering them according to the spec or something else? I'm talking about rendering them according to spec, but "standalone". So far Poppler can only render page-wise, it has no API to render a specific annotation of interest. That's what I'm trying to add.

[poppler] Patch in progress - looking for annotation related unit test data

2018-02-16 Thread Tobias Deiminger
Hi folks! Do you have PDF document(s) around that contain various types of annotations, for the sake of unit testing? (already checked git://git.freedesktop.org/git/poppler/test, no hit) I'm asking because I'm working on a poppler patch and wanted to add unit tests before submitting it on