Hi!
Since NetBSD-5.99.11, glob_pattern_p is included in libc.
The attached patch fixes the resulting compilation problem. Please
include it in the next release.
Thanks,
Thomas
: patch-aa,v 1.8 2009/04/22 15:25:05 tnn Exp $
--- poptconfig.c.orig 2009-04-12 20:14:38.0 +0200
+++ poptcon
On Jun 5, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since NetBSD-5.99.11, glob_pattern_p is included in libc.
>
> The attached patch fixes the resulting compilation problem. Please
> include it in the next release.
>
I'd rather see a HAVE_GLOB_PATTERN_P test in AutoFu, with
all the b
Here's something that was recently fixed for the popt that is included
with rsync: rejecting an arg to an option that doesn't take an arg.
Attached is a patch. A new error code, POPT_ERROR_UNWANTEDARG, was
created to make the error message nice. This handles both -l=value
and --long-arg=value wh
On Jun 5, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Here's something that was recently fixed for the popt that is included
> with rsync: rejecting an arg to an option that doesn't take an arg.
>
> Attached is a patch. A new error code, POPT_ERROR_UNWANTEDARG, was
> created to make the error mes
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> but
>--foo bar
> returns bar in the argument list?
>
Yes. The user may well have wanted it to be in the arg list. There's no
way for the program to know that the user didn't just toss some options in
the middle of some args (which I
On 06/05/2010 8:56 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
(aside)
Anything you want to see in POPT 2.0? I'm collecting features ...
Since you're collecting features... =)
One thing I'd like is to extend the help/usage capability just a little.
So I'd like to be able to have more descriptive usage paramete
On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> but
>--foo bar
> returns bar in the argument list?
>
> Yes. The user may well have wanted it to be in the arg list. There's no way
> for the program to know that the user didn't
On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Danny Sung wrote:
> On 06/05/2010 8:56 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>> (aside)
>> Anything you want to see in POPT 2.0? I'm collecting features ...
>>
>
> Since you're collecting features... =)
>
> One thing I'd like is to extend the help/usage capability just a litt
Since --help is the the topic de jure ...
... adding a popt table processor callback to
transform --help spewage opaquely into whatever
form is desired, with some simple transforms
like HTML tables or DocBook XML markup or YAML
used for configuring persistent option default
settings, or the exist
