On 14/06/2017 04:10, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
On Jun 10, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Peter Backes mailto:r...@helen.plasma.xg8.de>> wrote:
Hello,
popt ignores /.popt if /etc/popt.d is empty.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051685 (you can find a
patch there).
Applied: thanks for the
> On Jun 10, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Peter Backes wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> popt ignores /.popt if /etc/popt.d is empty.
>
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051685 (you can find a
> patch there).
>
Applied: thanks for the pointer to rhbz#1051685!
> Oddly enough, the current CVS vers
Hello,
popt ignores /.popt if /etc/popt.d is empty.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051685 (you can find a
patch there).
Oddly enough, the current CVS version reads /.popt, but only
because it has another bug which causes it to ignore /etc/popt.d
completely. Here is a patch f