Hi Ed,
We haven't test it on the Unmatched, so I don' t know the answer. And the
unmatched board may be not available for us until Feb. 2021 at the earliest.
Yadong
-Original Message-
From: porters-dev [mailto:porters-dev-r...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of
Edward Nevill
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 5:02 AM
To: porters-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: openjdk riscv64 port
On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 02:02 +, wangyadong (E) wrote:
> Hi,
>We implemented a RV64G port of OpenJDK11u(TemplateInterpreter, C1 and C2)
> and open source to https://gitee.com/openeuler/bishengjdk-11/tree/risc-v/ .
> Would the community like to help us to create a project? And then we can
> promote it stable with the community.
>
> Yadong Wang
> Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
>
Hi,
In order to progress this a riscv-port project will need to be created. There
was an initial attempt to get a riscv-port project started in Feb. 2018 (see
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/porters-dev/2018-February/thread.html).
The process for creation of a new OpenJDK project is described at
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project
In accordance with the OpenJDK bylaws the initial discussion should be sent to
the general discussion list, discuss.at.openjdk.dot.java.dot.net with the
subject line "Call for Discussion: New Project: riscv-port".
However, it may be best to have an initial discussion here on porters-dev
before submitting the formal Call for Discussion on discuss.
The project will need a project lead who must be a Contributor and must be
sponsored by a Group Lead. Although technically any Group Lead could sponsor
this project, in practice it should be the Group Lead of the porters project,
Dalibor Topic.
All the best,
Ed.
