Re: privoxy

2006-09-25 Thread Schöberle Dániel
I've been running privoxy on FreeBSD for a couple of years and decided to move it to a machine running OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) The package (privoxy-3.0.3p0) seems to load normally and seems to start normally Odd thing is that the privoxy logfile shows only: Sep 24 09:56:31

Re: New port, py-silc-0.4

2006-09-25 Thread Martynas Venckus
One thing, you could want to consider modifying the patch-setup_py to have it respect PREFIX instead of hardcoding /usr/local/lib Updated. http://www.altroot.org/py-silc.tar.gz. Martynas Venckus

Re: New port, py-silc-0.4

2006-09-25 Thread nikns
amd64 current, forks fine. echo.py is kinda neat ;] On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:19:37PM +0300, Martynas Venckus wrote: One thing, you could want to consider modifying the patch-setup_py to have it respect PREFIX instead of hardcoding /usr/local/lib Updated. http://www.altroot.org/py-silc.tar.gz.

php5 update

2006-09-25 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi. This diff updates php to the current version and includes the hardened-php patch by default. This diff needs heavy testing so please go ahead and help me. Please try to test on different arches. Thank you! Index: Makefile ===

Re: php5 update

2006-09-25 Thread Nico Meijer
Hi Robert, This diff updates php to the current version and includes the hardened-php patch by default. This diff needs heavy testing so please go ahead and help me. Please try to test on different arches. OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC) #691: Sat Sep 23 13:36:56 MDT 2006 [EMAIL

Re: Update: net/tor

2006-09-25 Thread Simon Kuhnle
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:12:41PM +0100, Rui Reis wrote: Works for me on i386. Same here, again :) Builds, installs and runs fine on i386. --simon pgpJyNDu4VEOl.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Asterisk Voip

2006-09-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
moved from misc@ to ports@ On 2006/09/25 15:24, J.A. Bal wrote: thanks for your reply. The problem starts with the asterisk.conf. When i add the package, it doesn't create asterisk.conf and it's not provided as an example. in the words of asterisk.c: /* no asterisk.conf? no

[PATCH] Winbind support for samba

2006-09-25 Thread Eduardo Alvarenga
Hi, This patch makes samba support winbind. Note that this will not make your Windows users appear on you OpenBSD environment. This is not winbind's work. This patch is a requirement for the squid-ntlm-winbind patch I'll send further. I'm running this for about 1 year in production with zero

[PATCH] NTLM/winbind support for squid

2006-09-25 Thread Eduardo Alvarenga
Hi, This patch implements NTLM(v2)/SSP support for squid. I'm running it on production environment for more than 1 year without any problems. Please note that no update to MESSAGE or 'update-plist' was done. I'm really not certain how to implement it correctly so I'll keep it with the

Re: [PATCH] NTLM/winbind support for squid

2006-09-25 Thread Eduardo Alvarenga
2006/9/25, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Eduardo Alvarenga wrote: +FLAVORS= transparent snmp ntlm-winbind I don't think ntlm-winbind is a correct syntax. Either use ntlm or winbind. Well, It can be ntlm or even ntlmssp. But just winbind may confuse people I

update: monit 4.8.1

2006-09-25 Thread Ben Lovett
here's an update to monit 4.8.1 .. Changelog from 4.7 available here: http://tildeslash.com/monit/dist/CHANGES.txt Ben Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/monit/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11

clamav

2006-09-25 Thread Chris Cappuccio
PFRAG.shared on the clamav port should list libclamav.so.1.20 and not libclamav.so.0.0 -- Do you even send e-mails? I told you, I'm from the Wild West. I write by hand. -- Chuck Norris

Re: clamav

2006-09-25 Thread steven mestdagh
Chris Cappuccio [2006-09-25, 13:39:39]: PFRAG.shared on the clamav port should list libclamav.so.1.20 and not libclamav.so.0.0 it lists: @lib lib/libclamav.so.${LIBclamav_VERSION} which is 1.20. I don't see any problem here. Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

Re: UPDATE: net/psi

2006-09-25 Thread viq
On 8/20/06, Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update from the really old 0.9.3 to 0.10. Since it seems that the maintainer isn't interested in this port anymore (0.9.3 is really old), I hereby request to be the new maintainer. The following files have been removed because they're not

Re: patch: isc dhcp with privdrop

2006-09-25 Thread viq
On 9/22/06, Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Come on people - why did this get dropped??? Would it be possible to repost the patch as attachement? Posting inline breaks formatting and it doesn't really want to apply... I could test it on my tiny and probably a bit misconfigured server.

Re: patch: isc dhcp with privdrop

2006-09-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2006/09/25 23:09, viq wrote: On 9/22/06, Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Come on people - why did this get dropped??? Would it be possible to repost the patch as attachement? Posting inline breaks formatting and it doesn't really want to apply... inline is fine with many standard

Re: patch: isc dhcp with privdrop

2006-09-25 Thread viq
On 9/25/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006/09/25 23:09, viq wrote: On 9/22/06, Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Come on people - why did this get dropped??? Would it be possible to repost the patch as attachement? Posting inline breaks formatting and it doesn't

Re: patch: isc dhcp with privdrop

2006-09-25 Thread viq
On 9/25/06, viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/25/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006/09/25 23:09, viq wrote: On 9/22/06, Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Come on people - why did this get dropped??? Would it be possible to repost the patch as attachement? Posting

Re: patch: isc dhcp with privdrop

2006-09-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2006/09/26 00:00, viq wrote: On 9/25/06, viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/25/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006/09/25 23:09, viq wrote: On 9/22/06, Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Come on people - why did this get dropped??? Would it be possible to

Re: patch: isc dhcp with privdrop

2006-09-25 Thread viq
On 9/26/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006/09/26 00:00, viq wrote: On 9/25/06, viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/25/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006/09/25 23:09, viq wrote: On 9/22/06, Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Come on people - why

UPDATE: subversion 1.4.0

2006-09-25 Thread Sigfred Håversen
Attached an update of devel/subversion to 1.4.0 that is tested on Alpha and Sparc64. Note: There are changes in working copy format as well as in the repository format. See http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.4_releasenotes.html for details. I have attached a script for running regression

Re: patch: isc dhcp with privdrop

2006-09-25 Thread viq
It didn't break normal usage, though I need to read more what I can do with this patch. (i386) -- viq

Re: UPDATE: subversion 1.4.0

2006-09-25 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 06:30:02PM +0200, Sigfred H?versen wrote: Attached an update of devel/subversion to 1.4.0 that is tested on Alpha and Sparc64. Note: There are changes in working copy format as well as in the repository format. See

tclsh location

2006-09-25 Thread Deanna Phillips
Is there a reason why no tclsh symlink is made by the tcl ports? I'm trying to make a port that uses tcl scripts, and I'm not sure how to give it a path to the interpreter. I guess I could require tcl8.4 and use that full path, but it seems messy, and would require them, later down the road, to

Re: UPDATE: subversion 1.4.0

2006-09-25 Thread Sigfred Håversen
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 03:10, Tobias Ulmer wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 06:30:02PM +0200, Sigfred H?versen wrote: Attached an update of devel/subversion to 1.4.0 that is tested on Alpha and Sparc64. Note: There are changes in working copy format as well as in the repository