Hi,
Attached is the diff that applies the necessary change sets (15465,
15471, & 15468) from django to fix the issues mentioned in the
security announcement released yesterday. Details can be found here:
"http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/feb/08/security/";. I tested
this diff on i386 usi
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:14:56PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/02/09 23:26, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > I’m not sure what you mean by saying the ‘build’ should be repeatable,
>
> If you type 'make package' or 'make install', you should get the same
> thing whichever packages you already
On 2011/02/09 23:26, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> I’m not sure what you mean by saying the ‘build’ should be repeatable,
If you type 'make package' or 'make install', you should get the same
thing whichever packages you already have installed, it shouldn't use
one or other version of the bytecode compil
On 09/02/11 5:26 PM, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
I do know that packages are preferred, but *if* someone decides to build
from ports, he should not be forced to install 2-3 different jdk
versions (possibly with restrictive licenses) where jdk-1.7 would do
perfectly fine.
You're building from ports. Th
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:52:45PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Ports are primarily for building packages, and we want those builds to
> be repeatable rather than change depending on what you've got installed.
>
> If you want the easier user experience, use packages where possible.
>
>
> On
se non vedi nulla clicca qui
[IMAGE]
Ports are primarily for building packages, and we want those builds to
be repeatable rather than change depending on what you've got installed.
If you want the easier user experience, use packages where possible.
On 2011/02/09 16:19, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Hi ports@,
>
> found the following in
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, mark berge wrote:
> Can we add a tor.rc? Or is it too late since the tree is locked?
> Anyway, this should be fine:
It's far from being fine and it's too late anyway.
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> # $OpenBSD:
>
> . /etc/rc.d/rc.subr
>
> daemon="/usr/local/bin/tor"
>
> rc_cmd $1
>
>
Can we add a tor.rc? Or is it too late since the tree is locked?
Anyway, this should be fine:
#!/bin/sh
#
# $OpenBSD:
. /etc/rc.d/rc.subr
daemon="/usr/local/bin/tor"
rc_cmd $1
Hi ports@,
found the following in devel/jdk/java.port.mk:
[...]
.elif ${MODJAVA_VER} == "1.3+" || ${MODJAVA_VER} == "1.4+"
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS?= i386 amd64
. if ${NO_BUILD:L} != "yes"
JAVA_HOME= ${LOCALBASE}/jdk-1.5.0
BUILD_DEPENDS+= jdk->=1.5.0,<1.6:devel/jdk/1.5
. endif
[...]
So, I
No problem David.
thanks.
El 02/09/11 10:28, David Coppa escribió:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Gonzalo L. R. wrote:
Hi porters,
I make the diff for the update for Adsuck.
works here in i386.
Yes, but after the unlock
ciao
david
--
Sending from my Computer.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Gonzalo L. R. wrote:
> Hi porters,
>
> I make the diff for the update for Adsuck.
>
> works here in i386.
Yes, but after the unlock
ciao
david
Highly Distressed Property Alert
Propdistress a division of Propinvest have secured the following 5 distressed
properties before auction/liquidation/bank repossession:
Area:
Type:
Previously Sold or Value:
Distressed Price:
Rental:
Gordons Bay (Western Cape)
Sectional Title
R450 000
R340
Hi porters,
I make the diff for the update for Adsuck.
works here in i386.
test are wellcome.
Cheers.
--
Sending from my Computer.
--- Makefile.orig Tue Feb 8 13:51:20 2011
+++ MakefileTue Feb 8 14:00:32 2011
@@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
COMMENT= DNS relay for ad blocking
-DI
ألقوة لخدمات توريد العمالة Power Labour Supply
خادمات - مربيات- ممرضات - جليسات اطفال - مدرسات- خياطات - كوفيرات -
سائقات
عمال تنظيف وحراسة
طبا
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 02:28:58 +0100
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> These are caused by manuals contained so poor markup
> that makewhatis(8) can't make head or tail of them,
> as has been discussed repeatedly.
>
> However, espie@ is now working on some rather smart ideas
> to fix this - for 5.0, that is, i
16 matches
Mail list logo
