On 2014-03-23 22:48:28, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi ports@,
>
> he's a diff to update audio/mpd to the latest 0.18.9, some notes:
>
> - it adds a dependency on gcc 4.8 because code was rewritten
> c++11-style. There are discussions to reimport mpd 0.17 as
> audio/mpd017 for architectures not hav
On 2014/03/23 19:09, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> This removes TCP Wrapper support from databases/openldap and
> databases/openldap23.
OK.
There are also autoconf patches relating to this; all of
databases/openldap/patches/patch-configure_in can go (but keep
using autoconf as we patch other m4 i
Hi ports@,
he's a diff to update audio/mpd to the latest 0.18.9, some notes:
- it adds a dependency on gcc 4.8 because code was rewritten
c++11-style. There are discussions to reimport mpd 0.17 as
audio/mpd017 for architectures not having gcc 4.8 (ie anything besides
i386/amd64/macppc/sparc64)
ok? (+cc ports to avoid duplicate work)
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/vsftpd/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -p -r1.35 Makefile
--- Makefile30 Jan 2014 14:01:49 - 1.35
+++ Makefile23 Mar 201
Il giorno 23/mar/2014 19.48, "Matthias Kilian" ha
scritto:
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:37:37AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> > > > > That should be the following ports:
> > > [...]
> > > > And net/wpa_supplicant: I committed the update to ver 2.1 directly
> > > > without the librt chunk.
> > >
>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:37:37AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> > > > That should be the following ports:
> > [...]
> > > And net/wpa_supplicant: I committed the update to ver 2.1 directly
> > > without the librt chunk.
> >
> > But is it worth reverting it back to 2.0? Searching for lrt in 2.1
> > e
This removes TCP Wrapper support from databases/openldap and
databases/openldap23.
OK?
Index: openldap/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/openldap/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.131
diff -u -p -r1.131 Makefile
--- openldap
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:02:08 +0100
Marc Espie wrote:
| On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:13:34PM +1100, Brett Mahar wrote:
| > Hi ports people,
| >
| > I saw this post http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=139507378232184&w=2
from Christian "naddy" Weisgerber and was also dismayed to find qt getting
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:59:17AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:56:55 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > > Update to latest version; now requires gcc 4.8. Architectures other
> > > than X86 aren't really supported
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:56:55 +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > Update to latest version; now requires gcc 4.8. Architectures other
> > than X86 aren't really supported any more. I may look into that though
> > if there's any interest.
>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:13:34PM +1100, Brett Mahar wrote:
> Hi ports people,
>
> I saw this post http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=139507378232184&w=2
> from Christian "naddy" Weisgerber and was also dismayed to find qt getting
> built on my computer.
>
> It seems to be doxygen that d
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Update to latest version; now requires gcc 4.8. Architectures other
> than X86 aren't really supported any more. I may look into that though
> if there's any interest.
>
> Tested on amd64 and i386 already, but inteldrm only.
Real
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:13:34PM +1100, Brett Mahar wrote:
> Hi ports people,
>
> I saw this post http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=139507378232184&w=2
> from Christian "naddy" Weisgerber and was also dismayed to find qt getting
> built on my computer.
>
> It seems to be doxygen that d
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:18:44 +0100
Remi Pointel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is the port of python 3.4.0 and the diff to use it.
>
> Any ok to import it?
If I replaced my diff with this diff, any ok?
Cheers,
Remi.
Index: Makefile.inc
===
Il giorno 22/mar/2014 23.07, "Matthias Kilian" ha
scritto:
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 09:47:02PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Matthias Kilian
wrote:
> > > please don't commit any changes to the ports which got the librt
> > > changes recently; we're goinf to rev
15 matches
Mail list logo