Re: [wip] audio/mpd 0.18.9

2014-03-23 Thread Bryan Linton
On 2014-03-23 22:48:28, Landry Breuil wrote: > Hi ports@, > > he's a diff to update audio/mpd to the latest 0.18.9, some notes: > > - it adds a dependency on gcc 4.8 because code was rewritten > c++11-style. There are discussions to reimport mpd 0.17 as > audio/mpd017 for architectures not hav

Re: TCP Wrapper: databases/openldap{,23}

2014-03-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/03/23 19:09, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > This removes TCP Wrapper support from databases/openldap and > databases/openldap23. OK. There are also autoconf patches relating to this; all of databases/openldap/patches/patch-configure_in can go (but keep using autoconf as we patch other m4 i

[wip] audio/mpd 0.18.9

2014-03-23 Thread Landry Breuil
Hi ports@, he's a diff to update audio/mpd to the latest 0.18.9, some notes: - it adds a dependency on gcc 4.8 because code was rewritten c++11-style. There are discussions to reimport mpd 0.17 as audio/mpd017 for architectures not having gcc 4.8 (ie anything besides i386/amd64/macppc/sparc64)

vstpd, disable tcp wrappers

2014-03-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
ok? (+cc ports to avoid duplicate work) Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/vsftpd/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -p -r1.35 Makefile --- Makefile30 Jan 2014 14:01:49 - 1.35 +++ Makefile23 Mar 201

Re: security/wpa_supplicant (was: reverting librt changes in ports)

2014-03-23 Thread David Coppa
Il giorno 23/mar/2014 19.48, "Matthias Kilian" ha scritto: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:37:37AM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > > > > > That should be the following ports: > > > [...] > > > > And net/wpa_supplicant: I committed the update to ver 2.1 directly > > > > without the librt chunk. > > > >

security/wpa_supplicant (was: reverting librt changes in ports)

2014-03-23 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:37:37AM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > > > > That should be the following ports: > > [...] > > > And net/wpa_supplicant: I committed the update to ver 2.1 directly > > > without the librt chunk. > > > > But is it worth reverting it back to 2.0? Searching for lrt in 2.1 > > e

TCP Wrapper: databases/openldap{,23}

2014-03-23 Thread Christian Weisgerber
This removes TCP Wrapper support from databases/openldap and databases/openldap23. OK? Index: openldap/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/openldap/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.131 diff -u -p -r1.131 Makefile --- openldap

Re: polkit doesn't really need qt4

2014-03-23 Thread Brett Mahar
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:02:08 +0100 Marc Espie wrote: | On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:13:34PM +1100, Brett Mahar wrote: | > Hi ports people, | > | > I saw this post http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=139507378232184&w=2 from Christian "naddy" Weisgerber and was also dismayed to find qt getting

Re: update: blender 2.70

2014-03-23 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:59:17AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:56:55 +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > > > Update to latest version; now requires gcc 4.8. Architectures other > > > than X86 aren't really supported

Re: update: blender 2.70

2014-03-23 Thread Pascal Stumpf
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:56:55 +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > > Update to latest version; now requires gcc 4.8. Architectures other > > than X86 aren't really supported any more. I may look into that though > > if there's any interest. >

Re: polkit doesn't really need qt4

2014-03-23 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:13:34PM +1100, Brett Mahar wrote: > Hi ports people, > > I saw this post http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=139507378232184&w=2 > from Christian "naddy" Weisgerber and was also dismayed to find qt getting > built on my computer. > > It seems to be doxygen that d

Re: update: blender 2.70

2014-03-23 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > Update to latest version; now requires gcc 4.8. Architectures other > than X86 aren't really supported any more. I may look into that though > if there's any interest. > > Tested on amd64 and i386 already, but inteldrm only. Real

Re: polkit doesn't really need qt4

2014-03-23 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:13:34PM +1100, Brett Mahar wrote: > Hi ports people, > > I saw this post http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=139507378232184&w=2 > from Christian "naddy" Weisgerber and was also dismayed to find qt getting > built on my computer. > > It seems to be doxygen that d

Re: [NEW] Python 3.4

2014-03-23 Thread Remi Pointel
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:18:44 +0100 Remi Pointel wrote: > > Hi, > > this is the port of python 3.4.0 and the diff to use it. > > Any ok to import it? If I replaced my diff with this diff, any ok? Cheers, Remi. Index: Makefile.inc ===

Re: reverting librt changes in ports

2014-03-23 Thread David Coppa
Il giorno 22/mar/2014 23.07, "Matthias Kilian" ha scritto: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 09:47:02PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > > please don't commit any changes to the ports which got the librt > > > changes recently; we're goinf to rev