On 2019/10/18 01:19, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> That's why portcheck(1) yells if COMPILER_LIBCXX is in WANTLIB and
> no COMPILER line with at least ports-gcc is set [0].
I added that check mainly to avoid pulling in multiple standard C++
libraries to the same address space (e.g. via library
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:19:10AM +0200, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > - Drop Compiler, builds fine with all compilers. No C++11
> Yes, but there are platform-specific quirks that ports-gcc handles
> gracefully, unlike the old base one ;)
> That's why portcheck(1) yells if COMPILER_LIBCXX is in
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:52:49 +0200
Rafael Sadowski wrote:
[...]
>
> Please find attached a re-write of your proposal.
>
> - move to math, devel to full and I see math is a better category.
> - Drop do-test, cmake will handle it for use.
> - Add WANTLIB
> - Drop Compiler, builds fine with
