On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri May 22, 2020 at 08:57:21AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > IIRC it's installed there on purpose, exactly so that it is not
> > automatically picked up.
> >
>
> Fair enough, here another try. Just help cmake if inotify
On Fri May 22, 2020 at 08:57:21AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> IIRC it's installed there on purpose, exactly so that it is not
> automatically picked up.
>
Fair enough, here another try. Just help cmake if inotify is required
"find_package(inotify REQUIRED)". This make porting consumer less
On 2020/05/22 12:10, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 08:57:21AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > IIRC it's installed there on purpose, exactly so that it is not
> > automatically picked up.
>
> Indeed.
> But should we change the rule now and install it under the default path?
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 08:57:21AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> IIRC it's installed there on purpose, exactly so that it is not
> automatically picked up.
Indeed.
But should we change the rule now and install it under the default path?
> On 22 May 2020 07:28:55 Rafael Sadowski wrote:
>
>
IIRC it's installed there on purpose, exactly so that it is not
automatically picked up.
On 22 May 2020 07:28:55 Rafael Sadowski wrote:
Simple patch to fix FindInotify. CMake needs some help to find
"sys/inotify.h" and libinotify because we do not install it under
LOCALBASE/{include,lib}.
Simple patch to fix FindInotify. CMake needs some help to find
"sys/inotify.h" and libinotify because we do not install it under
LOCALBASE/{include,lib}.
OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file:
