On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:01:08PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/09/06 14:48, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 01:34:57PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> > >
> > > Kurt Mosiejczuk writes:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:04:42PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> > > >
> >
On 2021/09/06 14:48, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 01:34:57PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> >
> > Kurt Mosiejczuk writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:04:42PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> > >
> > >> How many is multiple? :D - the Go stuff is gonna get ugly(er?)!
> > >
> > >>
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 01:34:57PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
>
> Kurt Mosiejczuk writes:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:04:42PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> >
> >> How many is multiple? :D - the Go stuff is gonna get ugly(er?)!
> >
> >> net/go-ipfs for example, the output is useless because i
On 2021/09/03 15:20, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 06:30:01PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> > Put it into a `show-checksums' target so the regular `makesum' does not
> > get slowed down on already big/slow ports?
>
> I don't understand this suggestion. makesum only gets run w
Kurt Mosiejczuk writes:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:04:42PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
>
>> How many is multiple? :D - the Go stuff is gonna get ugly(er?)!
>
>> net/go-ipfs for example, the output is useless because it's so big :D
>
> Does go actually publish base64 SHA256 hashes for their mod
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 06:30:01PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Put it into a `show-checksums' target so the regular `makesum' does not
> get slowed down on already big/slow ports?
I don't understand this suggestion. makesum only gets run when one updates
a port. The existing output it fairly us
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:04:42PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> How many is multiple? :D - the Go stuff is gonna get ugly(er?)!
> net/go-ipfs for example, the output is useless because it's so big :D
Does go actually publish base64 SHA256 hashes for their modules?
If not, it's not the size of th
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:04:42PM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
>
> Kurt Mosiejczuk writes:
>
> > Whenever I update a port or create a new one, to verify the hashes I have
> > to run sha256(1) or md5(1) on the distfile. makesum does display our SHA256
> > has, but we use base64 format and everywhe
Kurt Mosiejczuk writes:
> Whenever I update a port or create a new one, to verify the hashes I have
> to run sha256(1) or md5(1) on the distfile. makesum does display our SHA256
> has, but we use base64 format and everywhere else (that I've interacted with)
> uses hexadecimal format.
>
> This d
Whenever I update a port or create a new one, to verify the hashes I have
to run sha256(1) or md5(1) on the distfile. makesum does display our SHA256
has, but we use base64 format and everywhere else (that I've interacted with)
uses hexadecimal format.
This diff makes the makesum target spit out h
10 matches
Mail list logo