Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-08-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, the static versions of the modules, like libp2edrvstd.a, are entirely useless, no point in packaging them. The same for the .la files corresponding to modules (unless ltdl is involved, but I don't see it). What's the preferred way:

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-08-02 Thread steven mestdagh
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:01:51PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, the static versions of the modules, like libp2edrvstd.a, are entirely useless, no point in packaging them. The same for the .la files corresponding to modules (unless

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-08-02 Thread steven mestdagh
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:40:57PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, this module seems to work. The annoying part is that it insists on ImageMagick opening two blank X11 windows. Ugh. Now I'm wondering if there are any advantages in

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-07-27 Thread Christian Weisgerber
The modularization raises some questions. On static archs, a module like libp2edrvstd.so can't be loaded (or even built). What effect has this on the functionality of pstoedit? BTW, the static versions of the modules, like libp2edrvstd.a, are entirely useless, no point in packaging them. The

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-07-27 Thread steven mestdagh
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:57:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: The modularization raises some questions. On static archs, a module like libp2edrvstd.so can't be loaded (or even built). What effect has this on the functionality of pstoedit? A very reduced set of available formats (6,

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-07-26 Thread Christian Weisgerber
steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, if anyone knows a nicer fix than the post-install part to have pstoedit use the libp2edrvstd.so.0.0 library, I would like to hear it. Don't add -module to the libtool flags for building that library. However, it looks like this actually _is_ a

Re: NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-07-26 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Christian Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, I misread, it's the reverse problem, .so.0.0 is actually built but we want plain .so. -module or at most -module -avoid_version should take care of this... but it doesn't. ... due to an unfortunate typo. Use -module -avoid-version. --

NEW: graphics/pstoedit

2005-07-25 Thread steven mestdagh
hello, Here is a port for pstoedit. from DESCR: - pstoedit translates PostScript and PDF graphics into other vector formats. - Works fine on i386, dumps core on sparc64 after an abort trap error. If anyone knows how to fix that... Also, if anyone knows a nicer fix than the post-install