Re: NEW: x11/gtkada (GtkAda-gpl-2.10.0)

2007-06-14 Thread Julian Leyh
Ok, I fixed my problems and now got a working version without any errors. Please test. Works for me on i386 with gnat from patched gcc-4.2 (see the patch at http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-portsm=117679065130354w=2) Regards, Julian

Re: NEW: x11/gtkada (GtkAda-gpl-2.10.0)

2007-06-14 Thread Julian Leyh
On 06:54 Thu 14 Jun , Julian Leyh wrote: This Time with attachment Sorry for the noise, but I forgot to include three patches that are necessary... Don't want to eat up more traffic, so I put it on my webspace. Please download and test it: http://vgai.de/ada/gtkada-2.10.0.tgz Thanks,

Re: NEW: x11/gtkada (GtkAda-gpl-2.10.0)

2007-06-14 Thread Tero Koskinen
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:14:28 -0400 Julian Leyh wrote: On 06:54 Thu 14 Jun , Julian Leyh wrote: This Time with attachment http://vgai.de/ada/gtkada-2.10.0.tgz Works for me on few weeks old (May 31) 4.1-current/i386. A customized version of Preben Randhol's Klokka linked successfully

Re: NEW: x11/gtkada (GtkAda-gpl-2.10.0)

2007-06-14 Thread Julian Leyh
On 21:11 Thu 14 Jun , Tero Koskinen wrote: Works for me on few weeks old (May 31) 4.1-current/i386. A customized version of Preben Randhol's Klokka linked successfully with the library and ran nicely. Thanks for testing it. I just noticed that the .gpr files generated contain the path of

Re: NEW: x11/gtkada (GtkAda-gpl-2.10.0)

2007-06-13 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:53:35PM -0400, Julian Leyh wrote: Hi, I'm currently trying to port GtkAda-gpl-2.10.0 to OpenBSD. The port seems to work fine, but I get an error with make port-lib-depends-check. It tells me that there is a lib missing, but the lib is the port itself. Is there

Re: NEW: x11/gtkada (GtkAda-gpl-2.10.0)

2007-06-13 Thread Julian Leyh
Thanks, Jacob.. I remember having read something about how to handle porting libraries, but couldn't find that on the homepage any more... It doesn't seem to use libtool, so I fixed the naming of the libraries in the Makefiles. I think it should be libfoo.so.major.minor... Thanks again, I'll