Re: [PATCH] editors/elvis: clang and other fixes

2017-04-20 Thread Donovan Watteau
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > * Various fixes from a forked Github version (there was no official > > elvis release since 2004), clang warns about most of them. > > Not an elvis user or familiar with development, but would it make > any sense to switch to the fork rather than

Re: [PATCH] editors/elvis: clang and other fixes

2017-04-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/04/17 15:55, Donovan Watteau wrote: > * Fix a build failure with clang; some symbols were > redefined (patch-guitcap_c). This class of failures is being looked at (and doesn't affect arm64 which is the only arch where this will actually be built with clang in bulks for now) so I think

Re: [PATCH] editors/elvis: clang and other fixes

2017-04-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/04/17 15:55, Donovan Watteau wrote: > Here are various fixes for editors/elvis: Nice, thanks. Will test in a bit. > * Various fixes from a forked Github version (there was no official > elvis release since 2004), clang warns about most of them. Not an elvis user or familiar with